It amuses me that people always mentions things of this nature. If the answer is simply, yes.... Then it's still doing it far faster than you are. Making it a better developer than most others.

It's like Watson beating the top people at jeopardy. Was it just searching the internet? Pretty much. Did it in turn win jeopardy? Yes.

So does the how matter?

Is there overlap between earthquake and flooding? Flooding the earthquake in Japan caused flooding?

Which makes it basically useless.

Inferential statistics must not be data huh? 🙄

Are these arbitrarily chosen songs? Would also like to see if there's a relationship between wpm and bpm. Otherwise cool stuff

Yeah, I feel there must be something missing here. It's unclear to me how long an organization could run sinking 87m a year.

CEO is 48% greater than DJIA... I'll go ahead and use your method and say it's 50% greater. Because twisting statistics is apparently what YOU do in the real world.

50% greater growth sounds substantial to anyone that understands numbers.

Again, making up fictional numbers to illustrate your point. There is no 1000 nor 1400, you're rounding. You're also negating the DJIA and doing some sort of rounding between that and the S&P.

And 10%? Those others "90%" of factors impacting a stock price are also heavily influenced by the CEO.

Anyhow, have a great day with your made up numbers 👍🏻

I mean.... It does contain the same information. If the CEO was bad, the stock price wouldn't go up. It at the very least implies how the CEO is currently doing.

And ok, your 40% was making up numbers, gotcha.

The price of a companies stock is most certainly impacted by the quality of its CEO. And where are you getting 40% from?