MindForeverWandering
MindForeverWandering t1_j6cflf7 wrote
Reply to comment by Micke_xyz in In the event of a fatal manned mission (example Artemis 2), would exploration stop in this period? by damarisu
They never would have given up after Apollo 1 because it was too important (at least symbolically and as a matter of global prestige) to get to the moon before the Soviets did.
MindForeverWandering t1_j6caykp wrote
Reply to TIFU by taking /way/ too much acid and having a naked breakdown on campus by Emergency-Nail-9921
“Don’t do drugs, kids.”
MindForeverWandering t1_iup3j7g wrote
Reply to Audio-Technica resurrects its Sound Burger portable turntable from the '80s by thebelsnickle1991
“ThE sOuNd Is So MuCh WaRmEr!!!”
MindForeverWandering t1_iuk7yp6 wrote
Reply to comment by polloklo in should I tell my girlfriend that her parents had lunch with me? by Practiccount
I'm guessing she'll probably brush it off as a joke on their part.
MindForeverWandering t1_j6cg0c5 wrote
Reply to comment by mcarterphoto in In the event of a fatal manned mission (example Artemis 2), would exploration stop in this period? by damarisu
I agree with your general point, but would note that the pause after Apollo 1 was over eighteen months, not five. The fire took place in January of 1967; the next manned launch was in the autumn (October, I believe) of 1968.