Myske1

Myske1 t1_jd8jp0b wrote

Reply to comment by nychuman in Bring on congestion pricing by nychuman

Hey, thanks for the personal insult. Really elevated the conversation.

I've been walking in this city since the 1970s. I've never been hit by anything. If you're so scared of walking the streets that you have to take a bus to deal with your paranoia caused by the occasional extremely rare crash, maybe you live in the wrong city. Or maybe you should seek mental health counseling to deal with your anxiety issues.

And, yes, watch where you're going. Keep your phone in your pocket. Pay attention to your surroundings. You'll be fine.

1

Myske1 t1_j25j3cd wrote

There are like a billion people around the world who would rather live in NYC than where they live. We’re not building for all of them. Even if you’re a real estate developer shill, you have to acknowledge there is some sort of upper limit. The only thing we’re actually arguing about is what that limit is.

−2

Myske1 t1_j21r72b wrote

False. Prices depend on both supply and demand. The real estate developers want to make money and have convinced everybody that their supply-side approach is the right one. Reducing demand would do it just as well, and that would involve population loss. People moving away or dying faster than they arrive or are born.

It's happened before. The population dropped like crazy when people started moving to the burbs in big numbers in the 60s and 70s. Rents dropped. Sale prices dropped. People were picking up whole brownstones for almost nothing.

1

Myske1 t1_j204kjg wrote

We’re not suffering from a drought. We’re suffering from a lack of water mains and pipes in areas of potential expansion. Sewage is a huge problem. The system overflows during storms all the time, and adding more sewage will just make it worse. These are real problems, despite what propagandists from the real estate industry have convinced you to believe.

−4

Myske1 t1_j2027u6 wrote

Immigrants arriving in NYC have used it as a gateway to move on to the rest of the country after days, months, or years for as long as there has been a country.

Not everyone needs to live in NYC, not everyone gets to, not everyone can afford to, and so on. There are probably a billion people around the world who would rather live here than where they live. Should they all be crammed into the city?

−5

Myske1 t1_j1zw1uv wrote

Lived here for all my life, and I’ve seen neighborhoods wrecked by overdevelopment. At some point, enough is enough, and we need to stand up to the crooked real estate industry.

You act like migration is a bad thing. Or new. It’s neither. People have been moving from NYC to other places in big numbers since the city was founded. Without international immigration, we’d have net population loss.

The solution for people who want a cheaper place to live is to move somewhere cheaper. It’s not that complicated.

0

Myske1 t1_j1zp3j1 wrote

Sure it does. It's called moving to somewhere else. Cleveland. Detroit. Hell, any city except SF. Not everyone gets to live in NYC, and when more people start looking elsewhere, the pressure on the housing market will lessen. If you can't find a place to live here, get your ass to Rochester.

−14