Counterpoint: Given that disabled folks are a small minority and the degree to which they are disabled can and does vary wildly is it reasonable to expect that significant time and money is poured into every effort to accommodate them across all mediums?

Should the base experience and feeling of achievement be tainted for the majority to cater for the minority?

For clarity: I'm not railing against the idea of accessibility options to assist disabled folks. The more the merrier imo. I'm arguing that there are certain core "features" of certain games, one of which is difficulty, that should not be sacrificed at the alter of accessibility...because the two concepts are not mutually inclusive.

Accessibility <> difficulty modes.

P.S. The "this must be due to some -ism" argument is pathetic and tired. You're less likely to have any real engagement when resorting to playing that card.

Came here to post exactly that.

God of War Ragnarok has been universally praised for its accessibility options, none of which are the difficulty settings.

These questions are almost impossible to answer without the OP giving some context of what they are into.

Racism...really?

I mean I totally disagree with the OP's take here, but to equate it to racism of all things.

C'mon.

Oopsie, wrong person replied to ;)

Why do you believe it should have been a major focus?

I get the sense that because it didn't go hard on the theme you feel that it somehow diminishes the evils of racism?

Infinite's story is more than the political undertones.

External to the political themes its still a solidly told story.

I do however agree that I enjoyed the first games story a bit more.