Nill444
Nill444 t1_jcbmcr0 wrote
Yeah cool but can it... nvm
Nill444 t1_jadnste wrote
Reply to comment by CogGear in Snapchat is releasing its own AI chatbot powered by ChatGPT by nick7566
it's umm.. AI, LLM, neural networks... you know...
Nill444 t1_j9j68sv wrote
Reply to comment by Dendriform1491 in [Discussion] Exploring the Black Box Theory and Its Implications for AI, God, and Ethics by Disastrous_Nose_1299
>Today, science has explanations for many of those natural phenomena
Depends what you mean by explanations. You can always keep asking "why?" and at some point you won't be able to answer so you can just put god in there just like the early humans did. If you think what they did was reasonable then the same principle applies here, it's just that we have a deeper level of understanding
Nill444 t1_j4gfcfx wrote
Reply to comment by 2bdb2 in So wait, ChatGPT can code... But can't code itself? by Dan60093
advent of code 2022 was ongoing when people were using ChatGPT for solving problems (although not all of them) it couldn't have been in the data set.
Nill444 t1_j4fp1bn wrote
Reply to comment by manOnPavementWaving in So wait, ChatGPT can code... But can't code itself? by Dan60093
You are overestimating the abilities of mediocre IT students
Nill444 t1_j4ff4gi wrote
Reply to comment by 2bdb2 in So wait, ChatGPT can code... But can't code itself? by Dan60093
>It can write simple boilerplate based on solutions it's already seen,
It can solve Advent of Code problems...
Nill444 t1_jds698y wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
We're not lucky because the governments aren't ready to act on these sudden changes so the coming years will be very difficult. We would be lucky if we were past that point.