OGboxer11385
OGboxer11385 t1_jawbg0z wrote
Reply to comment by zerooze in Hatboro, Pennsylvania woman facing charges after racist rant at pizzeria by Snoi7
Speech is also verbal. ‘Hate speech’ is protected speech regardless of its form.
OGboxer11385 t1_jaw8cqs wrote
Reply to comment by OGboxer11385 in Hatboro, Pennsylvania woman facing charges after racist rant at pizzeria by Snoi7
Sarcasm warning. For those that can’t understand sarcasm
OGboxer11385 t1_jaw3k60 wrote
Reply to comment by RuinTop1965 in Hatboro, Pennsylvania woman facing charges after racist rant at pizzeria by Snoi7
Yeah let’s ruin her life get her fired and push her to self delete herself am I right…. Fucking people today
OGboxer11385 t1_jaw39f5 wrote
So more people that don’t understand free speech. Ethnic intimidation? So another unconstitutional law. Don’t need to make up unconstitutional laws infringing on rights to arrest people. Disorderly conduct trespassing are just two valid reasons to arrest her. Oh a third disturbing the peace, now we can argue the merits and constitutionality of some of these but they are long standing laws not some new bullshit. Sorry to tell you freedom of speech protects ‘hate speech’ protects the racist and the worse among us. It’s easy to protect speech that is wholesome and universally accepted like puppies are cute, but it’s harder to protect speech you find abhorrent and offensive. But protected it is.
OGboxer11385 t1_jawj70c wrote
Reply to comment by baron_von_noseboop in Hatboro, Pennsylvania woman facing charges after racist rant at pizzeria by Snoi7
The original poster looked her up. What was his intentions? Wanted to just see her employer? They wanted to cancel her they wanted others to attack