Optimistbott
Optimistbott t1_jeb36nm wrote
Reply to comment by Simkinn1 in Subprime is back on the menu boys! by megaultraman
But some are paying higher than the rate they get on safe assets including reserves which pay 4.9% (IORB).
Even if it's like credit card debt or safe mortgages or car loans or student loans, the fed's hiking, default risk increases, and that's priced in, but regardless, banks seem to be getting into the weeds a bit.
Optimistbott t1_jeb2fba wrote
Reply to comment by dwinps in Subprime is back on the menu boys! by megaultraman
sure, but in terms of accounting for safe assets, it feels like they need to make riskier loans or buy riskier assets to stay ahead of their rate theyre paying on their deposits.
Optimistbott t1_jeb1y9y wrote
Reply to Subprime is back on the menu boys! by megaultraman
I had this same thought today.
IORB is less than 5
T-bill and every treasury yield is less than 5.
commercial paper less than 5.
interbank less than 5.
What could any bank issuing a 5% yield on a CD possibly be buying with that money to turn a profit with safe assets? Discount window is 5% and they might as well be just borrowing from the discount window. But of course, they're now able to leverage the face value of T-bonds but those still don't have those 5% yields ultimately.
So banks offering 5% on CDs must be getting some yield on something that is greater. Which seems like they're going to be riskier assets. If a bunch of money is tied up in less liquid assets, the chances of those riskier borrowers paying back those loans (or mortgages) could go down.
After some degrees of separation of asset purchases, it feels like the higher yields coming out of the crypto sector could be the culprit. But that could be this house of cards with all of the unsecured stablecoins. Or something. There definitely feels like something there.
Optimistbott t1_j6c1cg5 wrote
Reply to comment by Eastern_Roman_Empire in Global Inflation Update by Infamous_Sympathy_91
I’m frankly so bullish on Zimbabwe. I’m thinking about buying so much of their cash that the carrying cost is like way higher than the actual value of the cash
Optimistbott t1_j6c14tz wrote
Reply to comment by Fausterion18 in Global Inflation Update by Infamous_Sympathy_91
They’ve been pretty good about not printing money though. I’m bullish on Zimbabwe. Are there any zimbabwe etfs? Buy the dip.
Optimistbott t1_j674uja wrote
Reply to Global Inflation Update by Infamous_Sympathy_91
What about Zimbabwe tho.
Optimistbott t1_iyf1obo wrote
Reply to comment by Boostlagg in Is this "fed pivot" in the room with us? by jtangkilla
Lowering rates after raising them is deflationary. Yield curve flattening after being inverted is a sign of a coming recession.
Optimistbott t1_jecu4cv wrote
Reply to comment by dwinps in Subprime is back on the menu boys! by megaultraman
You never know. They could be making safe loans to balance it out. But raising rates is supposed to slow borrowing, and the possibility of demand reduction to reduce inflation is supposed to make borrowing more risky. Maybe they already made the risky loans. A lot of long term assets depreciated due to rates tho. So maybe that’s where their heads are at. It’ll all be fine,