Optimistbott

Optimistbott t1_jecu4cv wrote

You never know. They could be making safe loans to balance it out. But raising rates is supposed to slow borrowing, and the possibility of demand reduction to reduce inflation is supposed to make borrowing more risky. Maybe they already made the risky loans. A lot of long term assets depreciated due to rates tho. So maybe that’s where their heads are at. It’ll all be fine,

1

Optimistbott t1_jeb36nm wrote

But some are paying higher than the rate they get on safe assets including reserves which pay 4.9% (IORB).

Even if it's like credit card debt or safe mortgages or car loans or student loans, the fed's hiking, default risk increases, and that's priced in, but regardless, banks seem to be getting into the weeds a bit.

1

Optimistbott t1_jeb1y9y wrote

I had this same thought today.

IORB is less than 5

T-bill and every treasury yield is less than 5.

commercial paper less than 5.

interbank less than 5.

What could any bank issuing a 5% yield on a CD possibly be buying with that money to turn a profit with safe assets? Discount window is 5% and they might as well be just borrowing from the discount window. But of course, they're now able to leverage the face value of T-bonds but those still don't have those 5% yields ultimately.

So banks offering 5% on CDs must be getting some yield on something that is greater. Which seems like they're going to be riskier assets. If a bunch of money is tied up in less liquid assets, the chances of those riskier borrowers paying back those loans (or mortgages) could go down.

After some degrees of separation of asset purchases, it feels like the higher yields coming out of the crypto sector could be the culprit. But that could be this house of cards with all of the unsecured stablecoins. Or something. There definitely feels like something there.

3