PRSHZ
PRSHZ t1_j95yf0u wrote
Dammit now I have the theme song stuck in my head.
PRSHZ t1_j6jez32 wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Helped me learn important key points when it came to JavaScript and other coding languages I’m currently studying. Additionally it helped me debug and fix a few projects I’ve been working on, this program can help people in just about any topic imaginable, from health and fitness tailored to a users input factors, to science and just about everything in between. It’s almost as if you’re talking to an interactive global encyclopedia with tutoring as a bonus. Perhaps you haven’t tried it or perhaps you haven’t fully explored it.
PRSHZ t1_j6ja3xu wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
To be fair, we are paying nothing to use it. We are enjoying every possible benefit this thing can offer with minimal effort on our part. As far as I’m concerned, they can do whatever the heck they want with it. I still don’t understand why people talk as if they own it themselves just because they were allowed access to it.
That’s almost as if you let a kid borrow your toy car and when it’s time to take it back, they get all mad
PRSHZ t1_j62v304 wrote
Reply to comment by quantumfucker in Member of Congress reads AI-generated speech on House floor by ejpusa
You’re right. Let’s add that malice is a human trait, but so is morality. Something AI are also incapable of. So of course it can potentially give you such instructions, or any immoral act; or so I believe.
PRSHZ t1_j616mrq wrote
Reply to comment by namechecksout35 in Member of Congress reads AI-generated speech on House floor by ejpusa
No, they use libraries full of context to try and match the best response based on inquiry. At least that’s the basic gist of it. And by malice I meant more that the program itself would be capable of independently and purposefully causing inconveniences.
PRSHZ t1_j60w81v wrote
Reply to comment by monchota in Member of Congress reads AI-generated speech on House floor by ejpusa
Granted AI is incapable of malice unless programmed, I’d trust an AI more than I would the word of a man, more so if said man was a politician.
PRSHZ t1_j13zdyd wrote
Reply to comment by OldMcTaylor in Microsoft-Activision deal: Gamers sue to stop merger by marketrent
Purely by choice 🤭
PRSHZ t1_j13wr8p wrote
Reply to comment by goldencrisp in Microsoft-Activision deal: Gamers sue to stop merger by marketrent
It really would, what I don’t understand is… since when the hell do gamers care about who acquires what? All we do is play the games. I can’t think of a single person I know that would go “oh man ms is gonna buy Activision?, I’m gonna boycott COD”
No.. we just play the game, finish it, now on to the next one.
PRSHZ t1_jdxvib0 wrote
Reply to Is this what French people look like? by Ajxyn
Heels from the future, two piece summer heels.