Proponentofthedevil

Proponentofthedevil t1_j57iq2d wrote

That's not the issue. The definition is just that. Yes, we know that bad info is bad info. The definition doesn't tell us what is misinfo. That's the question. Are you being purposefully obtuse?

0

Proponentofthedevil t1_j47b3gf wrote

Then what is justice without myth? How do you explain to me what it is without some sort of narration? Is there something inherently wrong to the idea of a myth/narration?

Money does have direct influence. You can use it to influence others, purchase things, or whatever. It may be a concept, but it affects us in real ways. "Do nothing" is a bit of a stretch don't you think?

1

Proponentofthedevil t1_j46yaj1 wrote

Then how are "needs" "rules" or even the word "must" not real? When you include higher concepts like ownership, or abstractions like money? Do these words not fall into things like "concepts" "language" "justice" "value" etc... you don't appear to be applying this consistently. You seem to just arbitrarily consider certain things completely unlike the things, I guess you like? So its hard to take seriously.

2

Proponentofthedevil t1_j46h0v5 wrote

Can I ask you what you think exists or isn't a myth? Or at least why you think calling something a myth is a way to dismiss anything? I dont understand what you're going for here. Its kind of incoherent but within the realm of perhaps "sounds smart to someone"

10