Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwcqv5 wrote on March 20, 2023 at 1:39 AM Reply to comment by Sashinii in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist It's not realistic. And that's the problem. Hopefully open source can help us move fast enough. But at the same time, that brings its own issues... Permalink Parent −4−
Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike Submitted by Sigma_Atheist t3_11w4ezf on March 20, 2023 at 1:29 AM in singularity 17 comments 0
Sigma_Atheist t1_j9c1voq wrote on February 20, 2023 at 8:45 PM Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity As far as I'm aware, there is no known quantum algorithm that could break AES-256. Your quantum chemistry simulation qubit estimate seems about right. But that's also a boring use case. You'll only make money off of chemistry researchers. Permalink Parent 3
Sigma_Atheist t1_j9bxzq7 wrote on February 20, 2023 at 8:20 PM Reply to Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity People realized that they're no good for anything. Permalink −10−
Sigma_Atheist t1_j9avhlh wrote on February 20, 2023 at 4:10 PM Reply to OpenAI Is Faulted by Media for Using Articles to Train ChatGPT by Tough_Gadfly God forbid anyone actually read our articles. After all, what are headlines for? Permalink 0
Sigma_Atheist t1_j5rtl12 wrote on January 25, 2023 at 2:48 AM Reply to comment by pre-DrChad in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated Top comment in literally any antiaging thread: "Omg nooo not immortal billionaires we're dooooomed" Permalink Parent 49
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwcqv5 wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
It's not realistic. And that's the problem.
Hopefully open source can help us move fast enough. But at the same time, that brings its own issues...