Sigma_Atheist
Sigma_Atheist t1_jefx9x8 wrote
Reply to comment by Antonskarp in Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
Not many, if any, of the researchers who wrote "Attention is All You Need" are still at Google. I believe one or two are at OpenAI as well.
Sigma_Atheist t1_jeazgu0 wrote
There is no known method of speeding up practical machine learning with real-world use cases with quantum computing.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je40kfl wrote
Reply to Commentary of the Future of Life Institute's Open Letter, and Why Emad Mostaque (Stability AI CEO) Likely Signed it by No-Performance-8745
I'm mostly concerned with complete economic collapse
Sigma_Atheist t1_je358so wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Indeed.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je33157 wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Because the reporting is misrepresenting quantum computers by making them out to be some supercomputer, when in actuality it is nothing of the sort and there's already enough misinformation disguised as science journalism around quantum computing as it is. It makes me mad.
Further, what actual thing? Nothing in the article tells you the qubit count or any other relevant stat. Another user pointed out that it probably has 20 qubits though, which is completely useless since 20 qubits can be fully simulated on normal computers.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2zukl wrote
Reply to comment by mescalelf in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Then it's useless! 20 qubits are fully simulable on normal computers.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2ovd7 wrote
Reply to comment by Paraphrand in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
I doubt ChatGPT would think quantum computers can be used to "crunch large amounts of data at high speeds," unlike your average person who hears "quantum computer" and immediately thinks the thing has an unfathomable clock speed without bothering to fact check. Shame on this journalist.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2nsbo wrote
Reply to comment by Fol1234 in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Because it can't do either.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2ng9f wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
No. But it looks pretty in a glass casing.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2nbxu wrote
Reply to comment by S3ndD1ckP1cs in IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
They'll be lucky if they can even factor the number 25 with this thing.
Sigma_Atheist t1_je2n0zv wrote
Reply to IBM unveils world's first quantum computer dedicated to healthcare research by Dr_Singularity
Amazing. In the very first sentences, you can tell that the author knows nothing about quantum computing:
"Recently, IBM and the Cleveland Clinic unveiled a quantum computer that could advance medical innovation like never before. The IBM Quantum System One was created to crunch large amounts of data at high speeds."
Senseless hype.
Edit: They didn't even report on the qubit count!
Sigma_Atheist t1_je1t5no wrote
PLEASE JUST GIVE ME WOLFRAM
Sigma_Atheist t1_je15y65 wrote
Reply to comment by Arowx in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
I've been in the trough of disillusionment for a while now for machine learning and neural networks.
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdyb251 wrote
Reply to comment by banuk_sickness_eater in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
No it's a real issue. If these LLMs aren't good enough to replace all jobs, but do replace a lot, then there will be mass unemployment and rioting.
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdswekv wrote
Reply to J.A.R.V.I.S like personal assistant is getting closer. Personal voice assistant run locally on M1 pro/ by Neither_Novel_603
Marvel is cringe. Can we use some other name to compare stuff like this to?
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdpmt2u wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in "Non-AGI systems can possibly obsolete 80% of human jobs"-Ben Goertzel by Neurogence
Which is the most likely outcome imo
And it spells disaster.
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdmwzlr wrote
I'd go with robotics from your list since it looks like the last jobs to be automated will be blue collar.
Sigma_Atheist t1_jdmajle wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Consequences of true AGI by Henry8382
Did you just copy/paste the plot of Transcendence?
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwm4zn wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
I'm not sure how that applies to me but okay?
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwlx8i wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
I was being a tad hyperbolic. To rephrase my argument, they shouldn't release any AI until it is capable of replacing all jobs rather than a subset. Because otherwise, the massive inequality caused by some large section of society losing jobs would lead to revolt.
Do you understand my argument now? Or are you just looking for what you view as easy pickings to let out your rage on those unfortunate enough to have you find their posts?
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwkf0c wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
Huh? You need to chill out. Consider reading that wikihow I posted.
I'm just expressing my concern over unemployment caused by AI. I did not steal your Snickers.
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwjwzd wrote
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwjj9z wrote
Reply to comment by Typical_Pianist_3761 in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
And do you see the problems that causes?
Sigma_Atheist OP t1_jcwjh2n wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Companies Need to Stop Releasing their Models until they are Godlike by Sigma_Atheist
Why are you being so hostile?
Sigma_Atheist t1_jefxgaq wrote
Reply to comment by dr_doug_exeter in Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
If any chat bot needs to change their name it's ChatGPT.