Superb_Nature_2457
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdy0o0c wrote
Reply to comment by SendGock in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
Yeah, it’s certainly a scary time, but the way I see it, those people were always going to find an excuse to hate us and try to kill us. It’s probably morbid, but I made peace with that a long time ago. Realistically though, this could also be like every other American mass shooting: a statistic and forgotten within a week.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdxzu7y wrote
Reply to comment by SendGock in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
No, I didn’t say they’ve died. They have definitely changed, but the same seeds we planted at still out there blooming.
Let’s be realistic about this: Bullshit wedge issues like this make very loud, very horrible people money. They give politicians easy distractions. There are a lot of people who have a good reason to gin this shit up. But just because bigots are loud doesn’t mean that’s who we are or how it’s always going to be. This fight has always been ugly, but it’s not hopeless.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdxoh7x wrote
Reply to comment by SendGock in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
It does show in culture. At least from what I’ve seen and experienced. It absolutely sucks that conservatives have decided to use us as the new scapegoat, but we now have representation and acceptance I never dreamed of when I was a kid. I openly wept the day I finally admitted who I was to myself because I was convinced no one would ever know what being non-binary is and no one would ever love a non-binary person, and now we have non-binary politicians, non-binary romance on popular shows, allies willing to fight alongside us, etc. The Govenor of Kentucky vetoed an anti-trans bill. Kentucky. 10 years ago, I would have called you insane for even suggesting that possibility.
This shit lost them 2022, and based on the polls, it’s about to lose them 2024 the same way. Way too many people now know out LGBTQ folks or have LGBTQ family members. These assholes have been exploiting a broken system for decades. They were exactly this deadly and hateful to every other minority who’s been in their sights. Americans are tired of it. You Americans especially. Even their own supporters — the real people, not the bots and grifters — are starting to recognize that this shit is a distraction.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdwcpqz wrote
Reply to comment by senorali in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
Oh, 1000% but that also goes for a lot of groups, you know? I wouldn’t call the cops for basically any reason unless I was fully comfortable with people dying, myself very much included. Unfortunately, that’s in issue in blue states as well.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdvezjx wrote
Reply to comment by senorali in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
I grew up in a red state and live part of my time in a deep red area. Respectfully, they do matter. Before this manufactured culture war bullshit, Trans people, my community, made huge inroads towards public acceptance and equal rights through deep listening and outreach. I like to think that the echoes of that effort remain. The more the culture warriors pull this dangerous, pointless and cruel nonsense, the more independents they lose and the worse their chances of a full takeover get. If you’re a Republican and can’t get above 35% approval of your bullshit in Mississippi or Alabama? You fucked up.
I’m not saying there’s not danger. Obviously I feel it more than most. But it’s also important that we recognize the other side of the culture war: Us dehumanizing everyone who lives in an area we aren’t part of because a map says so. In reality, there are good people everywhere just like there are bigots everywhere, and there are far, far fewer bigots than they would have us believe. That’s important to remember.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdtp1z8 wrote
Reply to comment by SendGock in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
Maybe. Did you see that recent study about LGBTQ support across all states though? On average, 80% of the US approves of gay rights and protections. Even in the South, no state dipped below 65%.
There are still people who love us and people who will fight for us. The genocidal maniacs haven’t won yet.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jd4gl6h wrote
Reply to comment by sooibot in The growing period of hardwood forests in eastern North America has increased by an average of one month over the past century as temperatures have steadily risen, a new study has found. by memorialmonorail
I mean, depending on the type, oaks don’t live longer than a few centuries normally. Their normal lifespans are 100-300, with some as short as 50 and others as long as 600. Trees are like other living things: They age and die.
There are some interesting studies on the impact of longer growing seasons. The extended growing seasons may make up for slower growth during increasingly common droughts, and they might also help store more carbon.
The biggest visible impact climate change will have on forests (outside of wildfires) will be seen in forest composition as species more acclimated to warmer temps take over. It’s not like trees die and then nothing takes their place. Even coastal ghost forests see shifts in species. The great northern forests likely won’t vanish; they’ll change how they look. Funny enough, that might mean more oak and hickory in some places.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_ja5j9nm wrote
Reply to comment by dangil in Danish waters contain about 100,000 times more plankton than microplastics — and if microplastic particles enter their mouths, copepods usually spit them out by marketrent
It doesn’t mean the stuff’s not being ingested by other animals, unfortunately.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j7rnyut wrote
Reply to comment by Wouldwoodchuck in Arctic warming contributes to increase in north-east Pacific marine heatwave days over the past decades according to new research by 9273629397759992
There’s a lot of action being taken, though I completely get how it doesn’t look like it. There’s a huge focus on habitat and population conservation, for example, but really, this is tied to the larger efforts we collectively make. If we want to save our oceans, we have to stabilize our planet or at least mitigate the damage. Preaching to the choir, I know.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j7pv3e0 wrote
Reply to Arctic warming contributes to increase in north-east Pacific marine heatwave days over the past decades according to new research by 9273629397759992
This is why our fishing seasons have been so heavily impacted. It’s a huge loss for coastal communities, both from an economic standpoint and from a cultural standpoint, especially for Tribes in our region. It’s extremely sad. I was in a conversation with an elder Alaskan Native who said that her Tribe doesn’t expect to be able to fish their traditional waters this year or possibly ever again.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j5x8j4z wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in Researchers unveil the least costly carbon capture system to date - down to $39 per metric ton. by PNNL
No time like the present to start building it out while we work on cutting emmissions, right?
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j1sddke wrote
Reply to comment by 53eleven in Soaring fertilizer prices could see millions more undernourished by Vucea
Regenerative ag isn’t just composting. It’s an entire sector that involves a ton of research and a number of different conservation methods. There have been a lot of claims made, especially in the last 8 years or so, about holistic management/regenerative ag greatly improving production and carbon sequestration that don’t really add up or end up falling apart under greater scrutiny. Less tilling also leads to more invasive species, which some farmers then compensate for by using more herbicides and pesticide. There are still ag chem businesses worming their way in by offering quick kill chemicals at the end of harvests to compensate for the lack of tillage, because you need to work the land year round to turn a profit. That sort of thing.
That said, we are moving away from fertilizers and overworking the soil. There’s way more focus on soil conservation methods, bioengineered crops that can better work with regenerative ag practices, and those methods I listed above. It’s just more complicated than returning to composting and calling it good.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j1s1jvx wrote
Reply to comment by KainX in Soaring fertilizer prices could see millions more undernourished by Vucea
Using human feces as fertilizer leads to major disease outbreaks, not just via the plants but in drinking water when it leeches into the soil. It has to be processed and treated, which then leads to more energy use and more chemicals.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j1s13y9 wrote
Reply to comment by Dizuki63 in Soaring fertilizer prices could see millions more undernourished by Vucea
That’s why we’re working on helpful fungi and modified plants to resist pests and help prevent blight. Hydroponics also takes away the soil issue, but it’s much more expensive to set up.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_j1s0tdd wrote
Reply to comment by 53eleven in Soaring fertilizer prices could see millions more undernourished by Vucea
It’s important to note that regenerative agriculture encompasses a many different conservation focused techniques. Most of them are currently being implemented, but some of the bolder soil regeneration claims haven’t been reproduced or show to work at scale.
That said, the industry as a whole is producing some pretty amazing work. Hydroponics, agrivoltaics, and dry farming are my favorites.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_isu27p6 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Severe COVID-19 may increase the risk for schizophrenia by chrisdh79
Honestly, it does fit with a lot of the weirder stuff they keep saying.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_isu212u wrote
Reply to comment by Doctor_Amazo in Severe COVID-19 may increase the risk for schizophrenia by chrisdh79
Well, sure. They also live in healthcare deserts. Rural areas in the US have a stunning lack of accessible mental healthcare options. It’s a serious problem.
Superb_Nature_2457 t1_jdy122u wrote
Reply to comment by SendGock in US-Canada agree to turn back asylum seekers at border by nat9191
Yeah, no doubt it’s grim, but they were always going to try this shit. They’re also attacking cis women or anyone else with a uterus, minorities, etc. Folks see the writing on the wall.
The other saving grace is that we have a better alternative to offer. We have the labor movement, and that legit has the chance to unify people. We have a common cause to rally around.