TunaFishManwich
TunaFishManwich t1_jd301ru wrote
It’s a subscription model. Hard pass.
TunaFishManwich t1_j92cwmt wrote
Reply to comment by SWATSgradyBABY in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
10 years is about right to go from “this will take $100,000 a day to run” to “this can run on my machine”.
TunaFishManwich t1_j8z6s3n wrote
Reply to comment by onyxengine in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
The cloud is extremely accessible. If I want thousands of cores and mountains of ram, it’s available to me in minutes. That’s not the problem. To even run one of these models, let alone train it, would be hundreds of thousands of dollars per day, and yes, if I had deep enough pockets I could easily do it on AWS or Azure.
It just requires far too much computing power for regular people to attain, regardless of what you know.
The energy requirements alone are massive. The software is far more ready for regular joes to use it than the hardware is. That’s going to take a decade or two to catch up.
TunaFishManwich t1_j8yv9pr wrote
Reply to comment by freeman_joe in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Get back to me when you have 500k cores and exabytes of ram on your laptop. It’s going to be awhile.
TunaFishManwich t1_j8yuujl wrote
Reply to comment by freeman_joe in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
It will be a long time before you or I will be able to run these models. They are WAY beyond anything consumer hardware would be able to run, and will remain so for at least a decade.
TunaFishManwich t1_ixixby1 wrote
Reply to comment by Exist50 in TSMC Racing to 1nm, Investing $32 Billion for Fab: Report by brohymn80
And think of where the west will be in that 10 years.
TunaFishManwich t1_iweix93 wrote
So about half a day’s revenue. (No, really, it’s half a day’s revenue)
TunaFishManwich t1_jeacjnw wrote
Reply to Taiwan: China paying people to protest Tsai's US visit by Kimber80
Cool. Arrest the paid agitators, and charge them with espionage.