Especially because humanity is able to think exponentially or collect wisdom fast. There are no differences between the cultures.... right?

Ever wondered why we have politicians to do the job? Why we're not asking each and every citizen on his opinion?

For example: We're able to extend the human life for like 50%, recreate conscious in virtual word, fix some of diseases already in uterus using gene treatment.

Should we stop until we're wise enough?

I think the best approach is to go wit Utilitarianism.

Yes, instead of align, accept the speed of technology and see that as a potential, let's bann it.

What comes next? Wiki? Google?

Isaac Asimov was right, when he said: “The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.”

?? Did I? Mindblowing != astounding

Well, just today I had a discussion on IT topics with a guy @ work whose is around 57. And our society isn't getting younger. The technophobia is just mind-blowing.

I keep thinking of Isaac Asimov and what he once said:

“The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.”

Unless you have a background in IT and take an interest in progress, the vast majority have no idea at all how fast AI is developing at the moment.

The EU wants to regulate AI and also slow it down. If we reach AGI in the next 10-15 years, there will be incredible dislocations in society. Many in the EU, and especially Germany will oppose this.

Personally, I think we're be there around 2030.