I see, will look into it more and come back with a solution

I see, will look into it.

My total data size is 40K paragraphs, where I have used Roberta-base and chatGPT was used for ai-generated sentences.

TBH, that sounds scary. AI will make life much faster and increase the productivity of every individual. But I believe various sensitive domains where the quality of information is the want, human content will reside.

ChatGPT supremacy ;)

AI can generate text that resembles human writing, but it is still not capable of truly replicating the depth and nuance of human writing. AI text generation models can generate text that is coherent and grammatically correct, but it lacks the personal touch, creativity, and emotional depth that is unique to human writing. This is because AI is trained on large amounts of data and generates text based on statistical patterns in the data, whereas human writing is influenced by personal experiences, emotions, and individual perspectives. Additionally, AI text generation models may still struggle with context-awareness and understanding the full meaning behind the words it is generating. So, AI-generated content can often be distinguished from human-written content by its lack of originality and personal touch.

That's what chatgpt thinks about writing text resembling human-generated content :)

I agree, but the point is AI, and e.g. chatGPT, will always have one way to generate content. Whereas humans may have diverse ways of writing and suppose if we consider an essay or an article, the way of writing by a human would vary with every single sentence but it would remain the same for AI throughout. That's how AI-generated content can be detected. If we do para-wise analysis, we would get better results and a clearer picture but it won't be the same for sentence-wise analysis. And there should not be any possible way that for a particular human, all the generated paragraphs come out to be detected as AI-generated.

The use of AI tools should definitely be appreciated. It is saving a lot of time and as a fellow developer, I would highly encourage it. But the classification of human-generated content is necessary as AI-generated content could be misleading, making it important to distinguish it from human-generated content. Also detecting AI-generated content can help ensure the quality of information being shared and consumed, especially in sensitive domains such as news and medicine.

Did you give it a try? It shouldn't be easy to fool this tool. Can you give an example of when it gives a false positive? Your feedback is appreciated.