Zaflis
Zaflis t1_jebxm93 wrote
Reply to comment by deformedexile in What if ai woke up and saw our current state? by lifeislikeaboxof420
What you describe is not artificial general intelligence but just a neural network or some script.
Zaflis t1_jbyceui wrote
Reply to comment by SpiritualTwo5256 in Researchers Say They Managed to Pull Quantum Energy From a Vacuum by Woke_Soul
Stargate is using ZPM (Zero Point Module), in that scifi it is a chargeable battery.
Zaflis t1_j9eg5xy wrote
Reply to How Our Reality May Be a Sum of All Possible Realities | Quanta Magazine by esprit-de-lescalier
I'm not sure what that means exactly, but it would be naive to think that if several realities exist, ours would be greater than all others.
Zaflis t1_j24qfid wrote
Reply to comment by MrZwink in 11 years ago Michio Kaku talked about mind upload into Machine - Big Think by keghi11
You only need to copy the stored information, not anything that is being moved at the time. Like harddrives and RAM but anything that CPU is processing now is irrelevant, if we compare RAM to the short term memory that changes more aggressively than long term memory.
Zaflis t1_j2323rb wrote
Reply to comment by MrZwink in 11 years ago Michio Kaku talked about mind upload into Machine - Big Think by keghi11
You are now assuming that every atom has to be copied with the exact same position and speed or something? But that is not correct. When you copy a limb, say a human arm to another person, it will still work even if it's different in a lot of ways. Accuracy can be improved but the copy is not, nor need to be too precise. And when you go into the computer representation, the format of data is already drastically different.
Zaflis t1_j229y8i wrote
Reply to comment by MrZwink in 11 years ago Michio Kaku talked about mind upload into Machine - Big Think by keghi11
It doesn't have to be 100% identical transfer to be fully recognizable by others and the person him/herself. Also i won't be using the word copy because when you "move" a file the original is lost. So is the brain in this case. If we talk about it as a copy then it's not an improved "you" but a new entity entirely. Ideally you could still think uninterrupted during the transfer process, in all points from 0% to 100%. Needless to say for science being able to do that all is still too far in the future.
Zaflis t1_iwlxan4 wrote
Reply to is linkedin dying? by diogo_ao
What are you referring to? There is no information yet in this discussion thread. As someone who has never used LinkedIn but considered it i don't know what you're talking about. Also from EU.
Zaflis t1_it6gp2h wrote
Reply to comment by Dziadzios in When do you think we can get AI companions that are indistinguishable from real (or close enough)? by Smol-Willy-Gang
The barrier is only technological. It is not yet possible to achieve human level intelligence on a machine. We are not talking about scripted chat bots, those have existed for over a decade. Every developer knows the need for such software is there, it's just that they are not able to.
Zaflis t1_jedlrru wrote
Reply to comment by deformedexile in What if ai woke up and saw our current state? by lifeislikeaboxof420
A flower too is a haphazardly assembled confederation then, but it has traits we think are fascinating. We simply have more of them. Much.. more.