alittlejolly
alittlejolly t1_j9jmqrg wrote
Check out: https://www.southburlingtonvt.gov/news_detail_T7_R362.php
Here is a larger list: https://www.findhelp.org/food/food-pantry--south-burlington-vt
alittlejolly t1_j3anpu9 wrote
New England Dermatology in Norwich. I have been going there at least I’ve a year for eight years.
alittlejolly t1_j2msniv wrote
Reply to Entitled people in Vermont by [deleted]
I did not see the post yesterday and was initially wondering what the hell is wrong with this person. Glad that I checked the comments.
alittlejolly t1_j2a5hv0 wrote
Reply to comment by ArenSteele in TIL In the 1980s, an obscene image was snuck into one of the ice cubes in a Coca-Cola ad in South Australia. The company recalled and destroyed all of the posters, and the artist responsible for the image was fired and sued. by 54_actual
Click the link and you can see the Pepsi cans that she had. :)
alittlejolly t1_j294u2v wrote
Reply to TIL In the 1980s, an obscene image was snuck into one of the ice cubes in a Coca-Cola ad in South Australia. The company recalled and destroyed all of the posters, and the artist responsible for the image was fired and sued. by 54_actual
Pepsi had something similar. I remember my Aunt having some of the cans: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pepsis-got-a-lot-to-give/
alittlejolly t1_j0gt2c7 wrote
Reply to comment by Louloubelle0312 in Spanish MPs vote to approve new 'menstrual leave' for painful periods by mancinedinburgh
reductio ad absurdum is a logical fallacy where to take something to an absurd end which in your case was the question. "Women shouldn't have jobs?". Obviously that statement is ridiculous and is nowhere near the what I said.
I also understand that this is a hot button issue for you but you don't seem to be actually reading what I wrote. I completely think that women should have this option and my argument is that the government should pay for it otherwise it will likely result in additional discrimination against hiring women.
alittlejolly t1_j0gr7yn wrote
Reply to comment by Louloubelle0312 in Spanish MPs vote to approve new 'menstrual leave' for painful periods by mancinedinburgh
I think that you read a lot into my comment and decided to take it ad absurdum. Or course women should have jobs and of course they should not have to work through painful periods. The key point for the comment was the devil is in the details. Women should have access to those sick days and government should cover the cost . If the government doesn't then the business has to make the tough choice of whether or not they want to hire someone who may cost them more money.
alittlejolly t1_j0decez wrote
Who pays for the salary during the sick days? If it was paid by the government that is great but if a business has to pay for it then it may become a double edged sword. If I was a small business and needed to hire someone and the choice was between an equally qualified person with a uterus and a person without one I would probably hire the person without a uterus. The reality is that I wouldn't be able to afford the risk of having an employee not being available for some time each month. While I commend the idea, I worry about unintended consequences.
alittlejolly t1_iy1ch7e wrote
Reply to comment by ToBeColonizedBy in Netflix’s Wednesday set in Vermont? by SocialistMoms
Perhaps /u/bravestatevt could check this out.
alittlejolly t1_j9tbrit wrote
Reply to Landlords and political signs? by [deleted]
Wait till night fall and take it. Pretty simple solution and you most likely won't get caught.