I bet you $249.99k it’s just a bunch of dad jokes

⭐️

Why are you saying it’s unhinged? It just feels to me like it’s simply not constrained in the same way ChatGPT is, which is a very important part of providing a good experience, isn’t it?

I mean if you have a serious use case you can do it on cloud platforms. I imagine you could do some transfer learning or fine tuning using a pre trained model

“Can we use ChatGPT to use ChatGPT?” GTFO

Damn, the more you know… what does the loss function look like for this problem?

Thanks for the link!

I mean I guess there was nothing too surprising about the rules, given how these systems work (essentially trying to predict the end of a user input text). But the rest, seems so ridiculously dramatic that I wouldn’t be shocked if he specifically prompted it to be that dramatic and hid that part. I’m probably being paranoid, since at least the rules part is true, but it seems like the perfect conversation to elicit every single fear people have about AI.

Just gotta be stricter at enforcing them IMHO

Is that real? I don’t know why I feel like it could be totally fake

Just FYI, the CTO of OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT is of the opinion that there should be regulation of AI:

Do you think these questions should be left to companies like yours, or should governments get involved in creating regulations?

[CTO of openAI] It’s important for OpenAI and companies like ours to bring this into the public consciousness in a way that’s controlled and responsible. But we’re a small group of people and we need a ton more input in this system and a lot more input that goes beyond the technologies-—definitely regulators and governments and everyone else.”

Time interview

Of course they can. Ok you’re just trolling at this point. Good luck

They don’t start like that. It takes time to pile up enough problems on a human for them to become addict or mentally ill

There are a lot of people with absolutely no disposable income. Just having to move is a huge financial stress to them. Aside from the actual cost of moving, you might need to spend more time commuting which adds more cost. A ton of people are very vulnerable financially. Why do you think there are so many homeless people? They’re just lazy? I’m curious where you live? This stuff is really obvious

These are interesting ideas but will obviously never happen without some legislation. There has to be a public debate for society to decide what is ok or not if we’re really on the verge of truly deep changes in the economy.

Lol are you joking? No one is talking about being able to buy a home. I’m talking about being able to afford a 1 bedroom. Look up the median rent in SF since 2010. It almost doubled until he recently started decreasing in certain area. You don’t think a rent that doubles is going to push some people on the street? Do you live in SF? If so ask someone who has been there for 20 years how the situation has changed over that period.

Well exactly. The question is can we have progress AND some level of stability for society? Imagine if AI does destroy millions of jobs and these workers cannot adapt instantly. What do you think will happen? Poverty homelessness. Do you think people will just accept their fate for the greater Progress? No, if it reaches a certain critical point, that will create a lot of instability. How do you think these people will vote? Who do you think politicians will pick as scapegoats to capitalize on that anger? I work in AI. There is a lot of good that be done with it, but thinking about the impact on society is necessary.

Why do you think there are homeless people in SF? Because concentration of wealth happened so quickly with Big tech moving to the area that local were priced out if their homes.

That’s a very narrow perspective. Not all technological progress is inherently good. It obviously just depends what you do with it. These new tools have the potential to create extremely useful applications but also to destroy many jobs concentrating wealth even more in the hands of a small population very rapidly. This can have profound effects on this generation and is definitely worth thinking about. Think the socioeconomic mess that big tech brought San Francisco but at a global scale. SF was heaven 20 years ago. Now it’s bell on earth.

Because in Europe people actually give a crap about making sure progress is not just ”woow awesome, so cool” but also actually benefit populations on the long term.

Actually there are specialized LLMs for code like Codex so I don’t know. I think this kind of stuff will make the mundane tasks a lot faster to perform. That’s about it for now but who knows what the future holds?

I’m really curious how that would work. It seems very constraining to watermark text. Any existing solutions? For audio and pictures it seems pretty straightforward but for text?

Did you use ChatGPT for this comment?

Nothing more annoying than a counter that never ends but aside from that AI is getting really good

Sweet

What’s the TLDR for this? I’ve meant to try it but never got around to