chrisinsocalif
chrisinsocalif t1_j6en581 wrote
Reply to Spock says hi! by TryHardNmity
May the force be with him.
chrisinsocalif t1_j2r3ahb wrote
Reply to Artificial faces are more likely to be perceived as real faces than real faces by [deleted]
I see so many filters on social media, this makes a lot of sense.
chrisinsocalif t1_iuq83mc wrote
He is Yason Bourne Identity. Saw him on Jimmy Kimmel.
chrisinsocalif t1_iuahy09 wrote
Reply to TIL strawberries, raspberries, and blackberries do not qualify as “berries” as defined by botanists, yet kiwis, bananas, and tomatoes do. At least blueberries are indeed berries. by Aequitas05
Sweetbreads are neither sweet nor bread.
chrisinsocalif t1_iu1mn0v wrote
Reply to comment by whenceremount694 in Engineer Karen Leadlay working on the analog computers in the space division of General Dynamics, 1964. by brolbo
I think it's a colorized picture.
chrisinsocalif t1_iti26pp wrote
Welp, off to Costco to get some toilet paper.
chrisinsocalif t1_irk8q5u wrote
Reply to comment by Caledric in Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
Yes and it will be referred elsewhere.
chrisinsocalif t1_irk86bo wrote
Reply to comment by Caledric in Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
The federal gov could enforce it but likely wont and it will be referred it to a local court. California and Illinois have laws stating they cannot use that as a defense to get out of rent.
The federal government has not cracked down every single time a state and federal law contradict. If state law contradicts federal law but it's not something that affects national security or international relations, the fed might not intervene. For example; In Nevada, certain counties have legalized prostitution, which also violates federal law, but the federal government has so far not enforced the federal law in Nevada.
chrisinsocalif t1_irk7dhk wrote
Reply to comment by DF_Interus in Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
It will be referred to a local court where these cases are handled. Likely California where this company is located and they will be obligated to pay rent.
chrisinsocalif t1_irk5kr2 wrote
Reply to comment by Caledric in Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
Pot isn't illegal in Illinois. The only caveat is federal banks cannot cash rent checks from pot dispensaries because it's not federally legal. The tenant is still obligated to rent and not a valid defense.
chrisinsocalif t1_irk56rj wrote
Reply to comment by DF_Interus in Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
They aren't breaking local laws. Federal banks cannot cash checks from pot dispensaries since its not legal federally but they are still obligated to pay rent. It's not a valid defense.
chrisinsocalif t1_iriioev wrote
Reply to Pot twist: Cannabis firm refuses federal judge's ruling because its business isn't legal under federal law by Doc_Dante
Usually (my) leases have stipulations not to do illegal things. It doesn't absolved them from liability. If a guy rented a house from me then stated he doesn't owe rent because met up with Heisenberg and made my house a meth lab and doesn't owe rent because he legally can't operate, he will get a very angry letter from my lawyer and a visit from the police.
chrisinsocalif t1_j7kzivz wrote
Reply to New battery seems to offer it all: lithium-metal/lithium-air electrodes by nastratin
I keep seeing new technology announcements but never see them hit the market. I will believe it when I see it come out.