curlyhairlad t1_je5ti1n wrote on March 29, 2023 at 4:55 PM

Reply to comment by bstz821 in [OC] Research Funding vs Human Development: a country's R&D spending correlates with its societal well-being by latinometrics

I see. Thanks

curlyhairlad t1_je4wvl1 wrote on March 29, 2023 at 1:16 PM

Reply to [OC] Research Funding vs Human Development: a country's R&D spending correlates with its societal well-being by latinometrics

Why do some circles have flags?

curlyhairlad t1_je4wqm5 wrote on March 29, 2023 at 1:15 PM

Reply to [OC] Research Funding vs Human Development: a country's R&D spending correlates with its societal well-being by latinometrics

The order of the legend got my brain in a pretzel 🥨

curlyhairlad t1_jdvcctq wrote on March 27, 2023 at 1:56 PM

Reply to comment by DuePomegranate in TSA stirs debate after ruling peanut butter as a liquid by bwaredapenguin

I’ve played enough Arkham City to know about explosive gel

curlyhairlad t1_j2eibq5 wrote on December 31, 2022 at 5:50 PM

Reply to Why people act like james cameron is a great filmmaker because his movie gross well at Box-office while also hating directors like Michael bay who do the exact same thing ? by HumbleCamel9022

Because your premise is wrong. People don’t say James Cameron movies are good because they make a lot of money. His high grossing films are just a consequence of his movies being good.

That being said, a movie doesn’t have to be “good” to make a lot of money (“good” meaning well written, acted, shot, etc.).

Michael Bay movies are what you expect them to be. There is a pretty sizable audience for his brand that buy tickets. His movies don’t have to be “good.” They just have to be what people who go to see a Michael Bay film are looking for.