I agree on both points: we will go into high-tech professions, both in craftsmanship and in my technologies (this is already the case). But there is a big but: not everyone will be able to go there, be by desire, be by motivation, be by culture, at this level it will be the universal income

Due to the power of the GAFAMs and their ability to exceed the Nation-State as it has been defined since Philippe IV le Bel, EA has been dead since 2020. The protests, like politics in general, are dead, because of their non-management of crises, I am not talking about the climatic crises, but also the economic crises which are accumulating.

These same politicians, who in Japan never used a computer, did everything to prevent a whole competent generation from working, for the benefit of old workers, for whom the technical pinnacle is the mimeograph (in France, it's barely better )

For me, strangely, there is a continuity between COVID 19, the invasion of the Capitol and the Ukrainian crisis. Undoubtedly proven that the man is infantile and deserves a good apprenticeship of wisdom. On the Iranian crisis, it happens regularly, if the religious in power fall (not close to arrival), it will be a sign, but I have big doubts

If only the speed of the GPUs, it's already played, we must see beyond the Ukrainian crisis

in an ideal world: Quantum computers will be in the hands of megacorps (e.g. an Nvidia/Intel/AMD merger), QCs will not be for the common man, but used by megacorps affiliates, such as governments or local businesses that have signed an allegiance with it.
Due to the AGI/Robotic predominance, man will have two choices: either go into stupor, violence and surveillance as in westworld
Where
Star trek, the conquest of planets and terraforming elsewhere than on Mars.
Regarding the super bandits, there can always be hackers in the noble sense of the term, they are to be helped and favored. As for the others.. The AIs, already protecting us, looked at the latest Nvidia GTCs

JD is more a problem than a solution, let me explain: their machines run on closed code, like the proprietary UNIX of the 1980s/1990s/2000s, like Microsoft Windows and all flavors of MacOs XI. Apple. It's an old way of thinking about 'software economics'. If GNU/Linux killed the competition in the server environment, it wasn't because it was free, but because it was open code and the community.

The private code blocks the economy. IF JD die, what will become of their customers? they will not be able to maintain their machines, it would be added one crisis to another. As I have said elsewhere , there is nothing to say that a Linus Torvald equivalent , for farmers , is not hacking one of these machines , for an open source equivalence

For me, if it makes it to production, to delivery and to be used by the customer, it will be as important as the GPU in machine learning: making power cheap.