kmtrp
kmtrp t1_jddt46z wrote
Reply to My Objections to "We’re All Gonna Die with Eliezer Yudkowsky" [very detailed rebuttal to AI doomerism by Quintin Pope] by danysdragons
Oh my god, how do smart (edit: I was going for "very busy") people have time to read something like this? I'm counting on AI to summarize it and still need to remove all quotes with js. I may post the summary here for the fellers.
kmtrp t1_jcxo0nx wrote
Reply to comment by scooby1st in Teachers wanted to ban calculators in 1988. Now, they want to ban ChatGPT. by redbullkongen
Yup, thanks to reddit's API this is what he said before the edit:
>Luddites are fascist. The AI revolution cannot be stopped.
The singularity will save us all.
kmtrp t1_jclss04 wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Those who know... by Destiny_Knight
kmtrp t1_j9co82s wrote
The overall design looks dated, and the navigation is clumsy and a bit disorienting, and I don't see what the benefit of using it is.
kmtrp t1_j7wndi1 wrote
Ok so we are a few months away to write about your new website and boom, it's designed, coded and hosted.
kmtrp t1_j687r3s wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
I think we'll harness our own biology before needing medical nanotech.
kmtrp t1_j5azchw wrote
Reply to AGI by 2024, the hard part is now done ? by flowday
Yes baby.
kmtrp t1_j5aecj5 wrote
Reply to comment by ArgentStonecutter in AGI by 2024, the hard part is now done ? by flowday
What?
kmtrp t1_j5ae1py wrote
Reply to AGI by 2024, the hard part is now done ? by flowday
Paywall and the spaywall extension can't find the article. Are we all supposed to be paying members of medium or am I missing something obvious?
EDIT: Incognito works
kmtrp t1_j5524u1 wrote
Reply to comment by DungeonsAndDradis in I was wrong about metaculus, (and the AGI predicted date has dropped again, now at may 2027) by blueSGL
I like the way you think...
kmtrp OP t1_j2djn9l wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence expect for the future? by kmtrp
I know that's what you are comparing to, I wrote it in the comment you just replied to mate. You didn't understand it I think, but it's not important. Happy new year.
kmtrp OP t1_j2digyh wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence expect for the future? by kmtrp
I didn't make a spontaneous statement, indeed it would've been nonsensical. It was a reply to your "It's almost like they know there are a lot of unsolved problems" implying that excited people here don't take those into account, no? But according to the poll, if you were right, half of that same set of experts wouldn't take those into account either, arbitrarily deciding that the experts voting for >2061AGI simply "know how it actually works" ; which I assume it coincidentally lines up with your beliefs. I'm sure you believe you "know how it actually works" too, yes?
edit: to be clearer, it's an idiotic response on purpose to highlight your idiotic comment, as in no true scotmman fallacy.
kmtrp OP t1_j2dhhk4 wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence expect for the future? by kmtrp
I picked it precisely because it's the 50% mark, how is that random?
kmtrp OP t1_j252a2l wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence expect for the future? by kmtrp
So 50% know something the other 50% don't...?
kmtrp OP t1_j24v779 wrote
I can't believe half of the "experts" believe AGI won't appear sooner than 2061.
Submitted by kmtrp t3_zybgwc in singularity
kmtrp t1_j1htzkc wrote
Reply to comment by fortunum in Hype bubble by fortunum
Not that you are wrong on that; realize that you will find all sorts of people in any large group of individuals, it doesn't say much about anything.
kmtrp t1_j1htm6x wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Homework9290 in Hype bubble by fortunum
This is the classic problem of trying to represent a huge group (of varied people that occupy the whole spectrum in intelligence, knowledge, age, etc.) in a few neat words to prove a point. It's nonsensical.
Submitted by kmtrp t3_z6rflh in singularity
kmtrp t1_ixeufos wrote
Reply to comment by RikerT_USS_Lolipop in Neuralink Co-Founder Unveils Rival Company That Won't Force Patients To Drill Holes in Their Skull by Economy_Variation365
Or just a fancy armchair at home.
kmtrp OP t1_ixd2jhp wrote
Reply to comment by QuietOil9491 in How to ride the financial wave of the AI revolution? by kmtrp
When did I cackle at "real artists" losing something? If you want to know though, I do find it amusing when a supposed adult strives to persuade the world of what "real" artists/art is and what isn't losing their shit. You have to admit that those egocentric, childish tantrums are hilarious.
We thought art was something uniquely human, difficult, marvelous, or whatever; now we know it isn't. A dumb machine does art in all mediums better and faster.
kmtrp OP t1_ixd0a19 wrote
Reply to comment by Redvolition in How to ride the financial wave of the AI revolution? by kmtrp
>As a side note, if you invest in the stock market and elect not to have children, you are a free rider, in my estimation, as generational expansion is half of the growth equation. So have lots of them.
Yeah, everybody knows kids are money-making machines... As per free riding, I pay my taxes, invest in indices, and frequently donate to world-improving charities. My money is outperforming most parents I know.
kmtrp OP t1_ixczm37 wrote
Reply to comment by kg4jxt in How to ride the financial wave of the AI revolution? by kmtrp
>"Most of the world isn't paying attention, yet" yeah right. Of course they're/we're paying attention!
Most of the world is not. The most AI your average layperson knows is that it can draw pretty images. AGI, the singularity etc is not on their radar, at all.
kmtrp OP t1_ix9fx1t wrote
Reply to comment by BinyaminDelta in How to ride the financial wave of the AI revolution? by kmtrp
These lists are making sense for me lately. A doubt I have is, sure, alphabet and others are the best positioned to get wealthy but, do they not separate things often? Like creating a spin off that has its own revenue and not tight to the big tech corp anymore?
kmtrp t1_jddwy21 wrote
Reply to comment by danysdragons in My Objections to "We’re All Gonna Die with Eliezer Yudkowsky" [very detailed rebuttal to AI doomerism by Quintin Pope] by danysdragons
No, sure, but the formatting would diminish the quality of the result. And rn I'm watching the podcast with the guy, making a bit of a deep dive as I'm also in the "concerned" camp.
If it's interesting enough I'll post summaries of the interview and the LW post here.