dpineo
dpineo t1_j7lfjb4 wrote
Reply to comment by aicharades in [P] ChatGPT without size limits: upload any pdf and apply any prompt to it by aicharades
Good to know, thanks!
dpineo t1_j7k5e5z wrote
ChatGPT can work on PDF files? How does that work? Does it just parse and interpret the raw PDF file? I'd like to parse some PDF files with many (thousands) of repeated table structures and convert them to JSON, is that something ChatGPT might be able to help with?
dpineo t1_ixk5ofz wrote
Reply to comment by Effective-Victory906 in [R] Category Theory for AI,AI for Category theory by FresckleFart19
Math3ma is Tai-Danae Bradley, the first author of the paper linked by the OP.
dpineo t1_ixj7ot5 wrote
Reply to comment by Matsarj in [R] Category Theory for AI,AI for Category theory by FresckleFart19
Sure. I see the potential of CT as being a language for expressing, reasoning about, and ultimately designing, AI/ML architectures abstractly.
In software development, we have the concept of "design patterns" that provide a common vocabulary with which we can describe common recurring patterns in software design at an abstract level. It cuts past the implementation details and allows us to focus on larger concerns, such as the composition and coupling of components, and the flow of information. This maturity in software development has allowed us to grow past brute forcing spagetti-code programs to developing robust enterprise-sized systems.
I believe that AI/ML is still in it's spagetti-code infancy. We have no idea how to build and compose AI/ML components into a system a disciplined way. To scale up to larger and more complex AI/ML systems, we're going to need to step back and look at AI/ML architectures more abstractly the way that software did with design patterns. I think CT may be able to help with that.
dpineo t1_ixhd0tq wrote
Reply to comment by iamthesexdragon in [R] Category Theory for AI,AI for Category theory by FresckleFart19
I'm bullish on CT in ML. I predict that in 10 years, that the word "functor" will be commonplace, similar to how the word "tensor" is now.
I also predict that we will misuse the word "functor" to mean "function", the way "tensor" is currently misused to mean "array", and mathematicians will continue to curse us for screwing up yet another one of their terms.
dpineo t1_ivqc8hn wrote
I'm a simple man... I see third party, I vote third party.
dpineo t1_j9rrdb2 wrote
Reply to [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
It's hard to worry about the "Terminator" dystopia when the "Elysium" dystopia is so much more imminent.