eegocentrik
eegocentrik t1_jarbfau wrote
eegocentrik t1_j9y7a3e wrote
Reply to comment by cooldude87 in Our stomach is always trying to kill us, Eating resets the timer.. by feuud
Also hunger is a hormone and its not produced by the stomach.
eegocentrik t1_j9mcydn wrote
Reply to The ease with which you can clean blood off skin with just water shows how frequently our ancestors must have gotten blood on them. by [deleted]
The ease with which you can clean shit off your asshole with just paper shows how frequently our ancestors must have bought Charmin.
eegocentrik t1_j6hq5jg wrote
Only when my Jimmy reservoir is full.
eegocentrik t1_j6hpizc wrote
Reply to comment by Jumbled_Apartment_ in Peanuts are beans and not nuts because they're legumes. by [deleted]
I am in agreement! This completely changes my life! This dreaded nut allergy has haunted me for decades. To know now, that peanuts are no longer nuts but legumes opens up so many new eating adventures!
eegocentrik t1_j6baanc wrote
Reply to comment by great_auks in The Tooth Fairy injects mass amounts of newly-created money into the economy and therefore directly causes inflation. by I_Seen_Some_Stuff
Balances out as Santa injects free consumer goods.
eegocentrik t1_j6b55zx wrote
Reply to comment by Buck_Thorn in The number of people older than you never increases by Bubbles_The_Mushroom
I beleive I'm the only one thinking on this, you are just lazily accepting the unpractical notion.
People are of many different densities.
eegocentrik t1_j6b0o50 wrote
Reply to comment by Buck_Thorn in The number of people older than you never increases by Bubbles_The_Mushroom
Yes. Yes you do.
Yes you need to know or you can't prove it.
Please provide evidence for your claim?
eegocentrik t1_j6ahj4v wrote
Reply to comment by Buck_Thorn in The number of people older than you never increases by Bubbles_The_Mushroom
I think you are.
You have to know the number to verify, you can't go through life assuming based on Fuzzy-Wuzzy non-practical applications.
The number represents a data point and that data point cannot be verified to be 100% accurate.
If the number is not 100% accurate then a reconciliation could cause the number to increase, thus proving your claim incorrect.
I think you are having a hard time grasping the fact that when applied, your observation falls short. It's okay to be wrong, you just need to revise.
eegocentrik t1_j6a5pti wrote
Reply to comment by Buck_Thorn in The number of people older than you never increases by Bubbles_The_Mushroom
What method would you use to calculate the number of people older than you?
eegocentrik t1_j698eo6 wrote
The "correct" number of people older than you never increases.
The problem becomes what is the correct number? I would argue it can never be known as the null hypothesis is unfalsifiable with current methods.
Census data would be the source for this data and needs to be corrected all of the time.
eegocentrik t1_j68qn3y wrote
Reply to We all come from a very long line of people who successfully managed to procreate by [deleted]
Not saying much.....
I'm more impressed when people successfully decide not to procreate.
eegocentrik t1_j5z14ay wrote
Reply to Historical mathematicians must have been quite impractical by nature since they discovered complex numbers before calculus. by Shamon_Yu
....or maybe they discovered complex numbers then invented calculus to help explain them?
Newton developed his fluxional calculus in an attempt to evade the informal use of infinitesimals in his calculations.
eegocentrik t1_j290ffx wrote
Reply to comment by M8dude in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Look up the definition of mathematical fraction.
eegocentrik t1_j28zu8k wrote
Reply to comment by symmetra__main in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
No evidence for gods either.
eegocentrik t1_j28ytru wrote
Reply to comment by symmetra__main in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
I didn't say that.
I said there are no numbers between 0 and 1, only quotients (Elements)
eegocentrik t1_j28xw3p wrote
Reply to comment by xSteee in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Yes, irrational numbers do not apply here.
This is not a math issue, this is a semantic issue.
Fractions are quotients of rational numbers.
1 is the smallest unit of count.
Half of 1 can be represented by the quotients 1/2 or .5
Half of one can also be expressed as 2 new things that are not 1.
eegocentrik t1_j28x6o7 wrote
Reply to comment by M8dude in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Nope.
The numbers from 0 to 1 are elements of 1, quotients, not numbers.
Does this contradictory statement make more sense to you?
eegocentrik t1_j28wc0a wrote
Reply to comment by xSteee in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
It's not a new number. It's a fractional representation of the numerator and does not exist outside of it.
There are not infinite NUMBERS between 0 and 1 only elements.
eegocentrik t1_j28vo6x wrote
Reply to comment by xSteee in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Quotients.
eegocentrik t1_j28vlur wrote
Reply to comment by imregrettingthis in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
I appreciate your support in this cause.
eegocentrik t1_j28utwg wrote
Reply to comment by M8dude in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
From 0 to 1.
eegocentrik t1_j28urvo wrote
Reply to comment by imregrettingthis in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Your Google search didn't work.
Your evidence failed.
Thank you for finally agreeing with me.
Sometimes you just need to check it out for yourself and learn something new.
So don't think that you are a moron or an idiot. We all start from scratch.
eegocentrik t1_j28u8wa wrote
Reply to comment by xSteee in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
Sure.
The .25 in 2.25 is the quotient of from 2 to 3 (1). 2+.25
Also, 2.25 is the quotient of 45 ÷ 2 or 45/2.
However, the OP said from 0 to 1, this is where my argument lies.
There are NOT the same amount of numbers from 0 to 1 as there are 0 to infinity.
There ARE the same number of ELEMENTS.
eegocentrik t1_jdtrrce wrote
Reply to TIL James Nasmyth discovered fine scale solar features, which he painted in detail and called 'willow-leaf-shaped objects in 1860. Now known as solar granulation, their existence was disputed for many years by Ok_Copy5217
...and Basketball