estoka

estoka t1_iucsmp2 wrote

What a stupid idea. We don't even build new nuclear power plants here. France has far better nuclear power production technology.

Edit: I worked in nuclear power, and we were constantly taught that the French commercial power reactors were far more advanced than ours. This was allegedly because the environmental movement in the US cratered investment/advances in nuclear power for the past 40 years.

We also didn't build a new commercial reactor from 1978-2013.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States

So, if you're down voting this, please chime in with your reasoning. I'm fully aware of the delays on the current French project, but my understanding is it's also one of the first installs of that model.

−23

estoka t1_ir1v7as wrote

What I'm saying, by referencing academic misconduct, is that people are willing to go to extreme lengths in order to remain relevant and employed. Why is it such a stretch of the imagination that research budgets would be motivated by public interest? Especially if said research is based on government funding. Sorry I wasn't more clear.

−1

estoka t1_ir16uzk wrote

So the mantra that we've been hearing for the last decade of publish or perish, no longer seems to be applicable? Research is not dictated by popular interests and a need to funding? Interesting.

−8