explicitlyimplied
explicitlyimplied t1_jdqick3 wrote
Reply to comment by Lirdon in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
They'll just be moved by programs not physical robots
explicitlyimplied t1_j2f6lse wrote
Reply to comment by Gitanochild in Will we ever cure addiction? by 4ucklehead
Addiction would still exist if those things weren't there
explicitlyimplied t1_izqksra wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Tech Workers React to Ongoing Industry Layoffs With Shock by Sorin61
How so?
explicitlyimplied t1_iu9mxx3 wrote
Reply to comment by mli in ‘Near-limitless CRISPR therapies’: This drug delivery breakthrough helps gene editing technology infiltrate cells by Ezekiel_W
Assuming crispr is involved there's only two marketable gene therapies rn. Supposed to be like 10 end of 23
explicitlyimplied t1_iu9mufs wrote
Reply to comment by ISnortBees in ‘Near-limitless CRISPR therapies’: This drug delivery breakthrough helps gene editing technology infiltrate cells by Ezekiel_W
Burnt
explicitlyimplied t1_itswbme wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Huge unveiling of schizophrenia brain cells show new treatment targets by Shelfrock77
?
explicitlyimplied t1_isbq14x wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Atmosphere_72 in ‘Near-limitless CRISPR therapies’: This drug delivery breakthrough helps gene editing technology infiltrate cells by Ezekiel_W
Therapies can ya
explicitlyimplied t1_ir84p80 wrote
Reply to comment by LordOfDorkness42 in "The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months." by Smoke-away
Gardasil?
explicitlyimplied t1_je8diel wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in Is capitalism REALLY going to disappear? by Phoenix5869
We centrally plan huge sectors though