fuserx

fuserx t1_je9huj0 wrote

For the record I am for this pilot.

But I do not agree with the way that it's being administered and I don't think that you can make any conclusions/ establish proof through this type of pilot.

Article said over 100 people applied and 20 of the worst people were selected. That's not how the scientific method works to establish "proof". You just get 20 anecdotes. Without randomization and a matched cohort of individuals with the similar issues, this pilot is useless

1

fuserx t1_jcazlm6 wrote

I'm actually surprised about this article...

I've known people that have had their credit card stolen and they could tell you exactly where and when the credit card was used. Most of the time, the police just say "oh well"...and the stores surveillance team doesn't give pictures of they people to the news.

What's different here??

2