geniice

geniice t1_j63z5bv wrote

> Roughly 10% of the human genome consists of about a million scattered copies of a single 286-base sequence (or "sentence") of this "junk DNA" called "Alu." It's the genomic equivalent of meaningless SPAM, repeated endlessly...

At least some of it controls gene expression. Beyond that the fact its highly conserved in primates suggests it does something.

1

geniice t1_iu4nqx6 wrote

−8

geniice t1_iu4nhm4 wrote

> Wind difference, both speed and direction, between inside and outside lanes. Not even for the obvious reason of helping/hurting some runners differently than others, but for the fact that it will affect the time it takes for the sound of the pistol to reach them.

sound is played from speakers behind each athelete.

>I wonder if eliminating the pistol and going strictly to a red/yellow/green light system like drag racing would work. I guess it could, but then these differences all crop up again if you start measuring down to the trillionth of a second...

You can't usefuly do anything at the trillionth of a second level because light can only travel 0.3mm in that time.

2

geniice t1_iu4mmnh wrote

> However... (also IIRC) that 0.1 seconds standard isn't actually based on science - it's literally just a number some bureaucrat from the World Athletic Championships decided upon because it sounded good.

There are a bunch of tests on the limits of human reaction times (mostly how fast you can push a button after a screen flashes). Human limit is around .2 seconds. Human perception is around 0.1 but it take a bit of time for humans to do anything with that.

So .1 seconds is a good point to chose since it gives you enough of a margin of error not to be an issue but not so massive that athletes can rely on anticipating the gun.

1

geniice t1_ituoi1g wrote

2