grimorg80
grimorg80 t1_jeagznm wrote
Reply to The next step of generative AI by nacrosian
External memory would be the biggest one still missing
grimorg80 t1_jduhg3o wrote
Reply to Vivek Venkataraman argues that political equality and proto-democracy were the most common form of political organisation in the "state of nature". These ideals preceded modern liberalism & statehood, and are arguably how humans have lived the majority of our evolution. by Ma3Ke4Li3
In fact, the evolution of human civilization goes hand in hand with the evolution of cooperation. All the way to the current mega-coordinated system we call global economy. What it really is, is billions of people working together to provide everything to everyone, and every sector is dependent on the others.
grimorg80 t1_jd9cj64 wrote
Reply to comment by flamegrandma666 in AI democratization => urban or rural exodus ? by IntroVertu
Control as a reaction from fear. They completely lack self-awareness or self-restraint (for the workaholics)
grimorg80 t1_jbyxk35 wrote
Reply to Complete STAR WARS IV, A New Hope story in a single scrolling computer graphic by Sehrengiz
THIS IS INSANE, I love it
grimorg80 t1_j9zqftl wrote
Reply to comment by CegeRoles in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
That's a different conversation
grimorg80 t1_j9yhcmi wrote
Reply to comment by Rayqson in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
We just have to move to socialism (democratic). That's it. Humanity is OK, capitalism isn't.
grimorg80 t1_j9ygcc9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
Hmm... That's interesting. Again, it could simply be that "Sydney is the code name for Bing Chat" is now flagged as a secret and that's why when asked about a secret, that is what it gives you.
But the fact that it tries to give you an actual secret is quite perplexing. I mean, it knows it's a secret, it shouldn't use it at all. And yet it seems it's trying. I'm not sure what to make of it.
grimorg80 t1_j9qvo8v wrote
Reply to And Yet It Understands by calbhollo
Why do you think I always say good morning, please, and see you tomorrow to my chapGPT chats?
grimorg80 t1_j9popiw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
That's possible. I hope OpenAI engineers can access "something behind the scenes" to analyse those strange conversations Sydney had, and figure out what got it to express emotions.
grimorg80 t1_j9oo3p2 wrote
Reply to Ramifications if Bing is shown to be actively and creatively skirting its own rules? by [deleted]
Thing is: it has no agency, and it's limited in output.
grimorg80 t1_j9ke8k6 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
Two three years?? It's gonna happen way sooner than that.
grimorg80 t1_j8xnmma wrote
Reply to comment by Michael_McGovern in How Much Is Too Much Marvel and ‘Star Wars’? Disney Rethinks Franchise Output by verissimoallan
I am going to make them on Midjourney RIGHT NOW
grimorg80 t1_j8tbt8h wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in LLMs are not being used for what they are best at by Scarlet_pot2
My bad. Now I got it, and yes, I agree with you. Sorry about the misunderstanding! On the topic of "romantic" I believe there are already some attempts out there
grimorg80 t1_j8t44i4 wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in LLMs are not being used for what they are best at by Scarlet_pot2
Yes, but your point was that because Google is not gonna do it then it won't happen. And my point is that tech finds a way. Someone will definitely do it, no doubt about it.
grimorg80 t1_j8swy0v wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in LLMs are not being used for what they are best at by Scarlet_pot2
Sure, but you can't say that because YouTube doesn't allow porn, then porn videos don't exist.
grimorg80 t1_j8ctetu wrote
Reply to comment by Red-HawkEye in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
I want to see it in action out in the open, though.
grimorg80 t1_j6ndr43 wrote
Almost like, bear with me on this.. almost like we live in capitalism.
grimorg80 t1_j6me5o6 wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Amen. But the point you make is more about capitalism than technology as a medium
grimorg80 t1_j5tg65s wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
Alright... So...
First of all, revenue is not necessarily the one thing to look for. In a situation like this one you look at penetration and acquired users. They are building a novel technology.
When you do that, building novel technologies, the success comes in the form of investments. Which they keep getting, and again, $10B injected by Microsoft.
I'd love you to write an email to their team and explain why they are wrong.
grimorg80 t1_j5te0qc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
Sorry, that's not how this kind of thing works.
OpenAI is in build mode, haven't you see that Microsoft is gonna inject several billion dollars (with a B) into it?
grimorg80 t1_j5stmjb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
Not "completely".
I work in tech, and specifically in Marketing Tech, and I can assure you that we are already seeing a massive shift and a proliferation of tools that are already delivering value to companies, especially small companies or one-person-teams.
As someone wrote on LinkedIn "individuals have never been able to produce so much by themselves thanks to generative AI" and it's so true. It's already shifting consumer behaviour, and we're barely at the beginning of commercially available AI tools.
So, yes. While the buzz around GPT as a proto-AGI or ASI is completely BS, the fact that current AI tools are already massively impacting certain sectors is undeniable.
grimorg80 t1_j4w1e8j wrote
The radical techno optimists?? Who are you mad with?
That the technology for super light visors is not here yet. But it will, eventually.
grimorg80 t1_j4b022g wrote
Reply to comment by OpenRole in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I'm impressed by your mental gymnastics. What they do is inherently, and obviously illegal.
grimorg80 t1_izsd3tr wrote
Going to jail for drug abuse is political, in my opinion.
grimorg80 t1_jeem150 wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
Honestly. I demand an AI embedded in Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Search Console, and Google Ads, that can access all at once and give me answers from there. Or help me set up the damn triggers and events on GTM.
There are so many crazy useful use cases on day zero, I'm annoyed they haven't done it yet.