gthc21
gthc21 t1_j49c5zz wrote
Reply to comment by No-Lunch4249 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
The other problem is it’s dumb alignment followed by non existent transit oriented development
gthc21 t1_j49buq0 wrote
Reply to comment by Single-Ad-3260 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
The alternative is remaining in car purgatory.
gthc21 t1_j49at44 wrote
Reply to comment by gthc21 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
May I remind you we were a larger city than DC only until recently, and they have a massive metro system.
gthc21 t1_j49aq49 wrote
Reply to comment by Single-Ad-3260 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Hm. Tell that to literally every small European city with extensive tram networks and a third of the metro population as us.
gthc21 t1_it4ejga wrote
Some confusions I am noticing on this thread:
This has nothing to do with undergrads and students (like masters students) paying to go to JHU. This is about PhD students, who basically are research employees of the university, doing a lot of labor, publishing papers, and bringing in all of the university’s grant money. PhD students take classes for 1-2 years then are just research employees who happen to get a degree at the end. It takes like 5-7+ years for this. Hopkins pays PhD students a small stipend to live on, <$34k. The administration increased the stipend by 2% in an 8+% inflation year and seemingly does not care or listen to graduate workers needs. They have also had issues continuously giving out late payments/missing payments for years. The unionization efforts is to fix this.
gthc21 t1_j49cgm5 wrote
Reply to comment by Single-Ad-3260 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
What do you think one of the factors that allowed rapid growth of NOVA was? NOVA has nearly doubled since the 90s.