hurtyewh
hurtyewh OP t1_je8rxts wrote
Reply to What's the word on the street about DCA QC? by hurtyewh
I got an Aeon X Closed, overseas I might add, and the right channel is like -15dB right out the box. Luckily Drop handled it wonderfully. So I was wondering what is the general consensus about Dan Clark Audio headphone's quality and longevity? I've had close to 30 Hifiman headphones myself or sold on with warranties and had only one case needing replacement. Anecdotal of course, but just makes me think.
hurtyewh t1_jdux7an wrote
Reply to What's the actual behind the scenes purpose of beyerdynamic making so many different ohms headphones? by aTraceMayBe
Likely due to professional use cases which translate well enough to consumer needs. The sound quality from my anecdotal experience is meaningfully improved when moving from 32ohm to 80ohm, a bit from 80ohms to 250ohms and mostly inperceivably from 250ohms to 600ohms. The reason would be the difference in voice coil mass and density and at least makes intuitive sense. The unit variation is also very notable with those models and matters much more.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdnntnn wrote
Reply to comment by covertash in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Ares II was high on my list since the price is not so extravagant and many sing it's praises. Need to read more.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdnnmkq wrote
Reply to comment by JAaSgk in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
None of the options I'm considering are available here for testing. Not even to buy used really.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdniicv wrote
Reply to comment by Ticonderogue in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Yeah, that's more or less my assumption as well.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdni8i7 wrote
Reply to comment by covertash in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
I can hear differences in some filters, but I don't find them better or worse in any usually just different. If it is so that purposeful coloration is the only way high end DACs offer something soundwise then that makes sense. Like Naim power amps etc have a very distinct sound which works pretty well regardless of genre if a tight, punchy, energetic sound is what one is after. If some R2R DACs offer filters that artificially, but functionally improve separation, soundstage etc without being a detriment in most music then I wouldn't mind trying that out.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdn27g2 wrote
Reply to comment by blargh4 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Yeah, that's my expectation as well.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdn20zv wrote
Reply to comment by SayEye in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
I haven't heard them and that's a bit much for a blind buy, but I'm getting an LCD-5 soon which is close to that price range. My expectation is that a $100 Topping E30 does essentially everything worthwhile soundwise, but I'm interested in being sure. Some Chord stuff in the thousands of dollars I like less than some cheap stuff as well. We'll see if I find any motivation to get the DAC. Seems not for now.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdmysrz wrote
Reply to comment by giant3 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Well DAC chips yes, but those can of course be implemented very poorly or very well. A good $50 dongle DAC seems indistinguishable from the cheap Toppings etc which measure far better than most TOTL DACs and the JDS Element.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdmuikn wrote
Reply to comment by SayEye in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Yeah, I have both, but with high end I mean something like $1000 and above for just the DAC.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdmerei wrote
Reply to comment by Background_Summer_55 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Yeah, I'm getting an LCD-5 soonish most likely, but I'm mainly interested in having experience with the difference and knowing if there's anything meaningful there. I already know that it's mostly pointless to go past the well measuring $100-150 DACs up to $500, but whether TOTL could add something interests me. Like I prefer HE6se V2 over almost all headphones 4-8 times it's price, but an LCD-5 is damn nice at 10 times the price.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdme8jm wrote
Reply to comment by SayEye in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
I mean all bluetooth audio devices have a DAC built it already. A desktop DAC is different. Likely mixing any external dacs or amps with BT devices will only make them worse since they usually have internal DSP without which they'd lose all purposeful tuning.
I have 40+ headphones, dozen dacs and amps etc, but the high end dac side of things I have little experience with.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdm1ev5 wrote
Reply to comment by SayEye in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
I mean there is a DAC somewhere unless you somehow use them fully analog.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdm12o5 wrote
Reply to comment by vext01 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Let's just say that I've spent my time there and I'm good.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdlyp3d wrote
Reply to comment by vext01 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
I won't.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdlxven wrote
Reply to comment by vext01 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
What better investment.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdlotrq wrote
Reply to comment by TheRealRodStewart_2 in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Not really, but still.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdlmlvp wrote
Reply to comment by coptician in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
Noted. Might actually be something I could use as well.
hurtyewh OP t1_jdlla42 wrote
Reply to comment by szakee in What does a high end DAC really offer? by hurtyewh
A valuable thing at that point.
hurtyewh t1_jaeiwf8 wrote
Reply to comment by Professional-Swim-69 in my first planars, I have to say, I'm very happy with them by gatorgage11
Yeah, LCD-2 Closed is the best closed back I've heard so far. XC was pretty bad without EQ imo, but with EQ might be fantastic. I'll make reviews on all of them when I get to it ;)
hurtyewh t1_jabzzui wrote
I got those and an E-MU Teak coming soon as well. We'll see how much I like them. Got a D7200 which is good, but maybe not as special as I'd like.
hurtyewh t1_ja3q8p9 wrote
Reply to comment by ThisGuyFrags in Finally added an Audeze headphone to the collection by om3gapro
The bass, when EQ'd, on the LCD-X is this heavy deep big club kind of sound that doesn't particularly lack detail, but is a bit slower than could be. The HE6se V2 doesn't lose in any aspect and it's extremely fast and detailed. The best I've heard. In many ways better than LCD-5 which has gorgeous and effortless, but not as technical bass.
hurtyewh t1_ja2zusm wrote
Reply to Crin signed the delta airlines ( W ) by Clickbaitllama
Those should be Crin's next collab tbh.
hurtyewh t1_ja2f7pq wrote
LCD-X is easily my favourite of the big four (HD800s, Clear, Arya), but only when EQ'd (Oratory1990's preset). Best value and the only one that can do serious bass and have least weaknesses left after EQ. That said I prefer HE6se V2 over them.
hurtyewh OP t1_je9cg7l wrote
Reply to comment by Orangutan_Ulti in What's the word on the street about DCA QC? by hurtyewh
I think that's just the photo. They seem externally pretty symmetrical.