inexister
inexister OP t1_jaebr52 wrote
Reply to comment by SasquatchFingers in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
Another good addition to the myriad of causes being mentioned. I can see how that might cause someone to abandon their humble abode.
inexister OP t1_jae4qrn wrote
Reply to comment by BobbyP27 in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
That's a great example! Do you recall the name of the church? And how weird that stuff just accumulates around it regardless.
inexister OP t1_jae4e98 wrote
Reply to comment by kmoonster in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
So many little contributors just adding up over time!
inexister OP t1_jae46op wrote
Reply to comment by dradrado in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
That's insane deep woah. Where at?
inexister OP t1_jae2nn2 wrote
Reply to comment by redhousebythebog in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
That's a great example of natural disasters like hurricanes adding to the debris. If people like that youtuber were around throughout history nothing would get buried!
Submitted by inexister t3_11dyv29 in askscience
inexister OP t1_jaefxlo wrote
Reply to comment by jlittlenz in How do ancient cities get buried under more modern ones? by inexister
Thank you. While I understand that rubble accumulates, the definition of a 'tell' really hones in on the sort of answer I'm looking for. "A tell can only be formed if natural and man-produced material accumulates faster than it is removed by erosion and human-caused truncation,[6] which explains the limited geographical area they occur in."
I think that's the same for any human settlement, not just limited to a small area, but whole modern cities. It's a question of rate of accumulation vs deterioration. Natural disasters just add to the effects of constant deposition.