>So AI is going to do for mankind all the things that human beings cannot do for themselves (cure cancer, give us immortality, create limitless energy, etc.), but you think people will have a preference to listen to the inferior advice of "a leader in this field"?

AI told me the other day that the way to fix my car sluggishly starting was to check the battery, starter solenoid, spark plugs AND fuel pump.

When every mechanic knows, it's just the fuel pump. There's knowledge, then there's insider knowledge.

Maybe something like "A leader in this field verifies this answer" next to the output?

They don't care currently. But when ChatGPT starts getting utilized more than Google, Google will try to adapt.

As a SEO writer, I imagine Google will put AI created scores next to their links.

For example:

How to fix your car: 85% likely written by human.

Fixing Your Car: 45% likely written by human.

I'm not worried about myself as much as I am about the population at large. I think the meritocracy is a great way to keep order. But that might just be my conditioning cuz it's actually been horrible for me.

And if no one had jobs the meritocracy would be lost and people would expect equal amounts of everything. When that's just not ever going to be the case.

But your post made me feel like maybe everyone can have equal parts.

Thanks for giving me some relief.

AI can be our alien race; something that unites the whole world against it.

We should just outlaw it.