maXXXjacker
maXXXjacker t1_jeeujf6 wrote
Reply to comment by Coel_Hen in Some cheap headphones are so good it's almost ridiculous. Buy the HE400SE and SHR840A. by mistersprinkles1983
I got mine for under $80 on drop, unbelievable! If my X4 ever kicked the bucket I would 100% buy another without thinking if it is on sale which it almost always is around $99. I prefer the comfort and fit of the X4 over the 400se but that's just a personal thing.
maXXXjacker t1_jees7kh wrote
Reply to comment by AidenBernstein in Some cheap headphones are so good it's almost ridiculous. Buy the HE400SE and SHR840A. by mistersprinkles1983
If you have the money and want to do it right, the Qudelix 5k would be my first choice and only choice.
If I need to keep under budget, next on my list would be the Creative SXFI AMP (not to be confused with the X1 which looks identical). The SXFI AMP has a LOT of power compared to other cheaper dongles. 370mW at 32 ohms. It happens to be on sale for 60 dollars. The Creative app for it is kind of trash on PC but it's usable, same with Android. You can adjust bass and treble and select from some presets and there is also the SXFI gimmick which I hate but you can turn this off if you share the same feelings about it. Works on PC/Android.
Last for me would be the Truthear Shio because it suits my tastes for neutral sounding headphones.
There is probably some new hotness out there in dongles but the only one I can confidently recommend that should delight is the Qudelix. Worth every penny.
maXXXjacker t1_jedjiht wrote
Reply to Some cheap headphones are so good it's almost ridiculous. Buy the HE400SE and SHR840A. by mistersprinkles1983
400SE is really a solid headphone. The X4 is basically its twin brother from Drop and can be sometimes had for a little cheaper. (I wouldn't really worry about which one is better as most will not be able to tell them apart so I wouldn't worry about missing out on something by choosing one or the other)
I would recommend some kind of dongle dac/amp at a minimum as I found my own desktop (alienware r13) to sound rather bland.
When I say Dongle Dac/amp I mean something a bit more robust than a apple dongle. While an apple dongle is not bad sounding per say and noticeably better quality than my desktop PC, it doesn't quite do the headphone justice.
I'm a bit fond of my Creative SXFI AMP dongle with the 400se (without SXFI enabled). I'm sure the latest wave of cheap dongles like the 7hz, Shio, iFi Go Link and such are probably all fine. I'd shoot for a Qudelix 5k if budget allows which makes for a great computer dac/amp in my opinion. For those that already have a full sized desktop dac/amp, you already have all you need unless for whatever reason your gear makes the headphone sound muffled and flat or you can't get enough volume. The volume ranges I listen at are around 65-75dB with peaks into 85dB. I do not usually use EQ with the 400se as I think it sounds good as is but sometimes a boost in bass to add a little warmth hits the spot when the mood strikes.
maXXXjacker t1_je8ndfm wrote
Reply to comment by WeakestBoss in The right driver on my HE1000SE just died, again... by fgt-boi
The golden question.
maXXXjacker t1_je7fvzn wrote
Reply to comment by andysaurus_rex in Really enjoying my new $350 "budget" setup. HD660S and Topping DX1 by Jfox8
6.35mm and 3.5mm single ended outputs.
maXXXjacker t1_je6vtmg wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I never thought amps made much of a difference...until I got a Liquid Spark by givemeyournews
I value both fact and opinion.
How you personally choose to accept opinion and what you end up doing with that is up to you. It's okay to disagree.
Without railroading the conversation any further which it ends here between us, I heard minor nuances between amps. What I heard is not backed by any factual data or rigorous testing criteria and was never intended to. Just a dude on reddit casually commenting on a few amps and reflecting upon what was heard.
Since I had the Liquid Spark, the 788 AND for the sake of being able to contribute and form an opinion that isn't 100% spewing out of my ass by going off memory or looking at somebodies review I made an effort to physically sample the amps and it just so happens that I had a shared experience as the OP. How I compared the amps is about as simple as you can get it which in short is hooking the two amps up to a line switcher to the same DAC, do your best to keep to the same volume level and let it rip on a few songs and then switch to the next amp, sometimes at different intervals. This isn't ASR levels of conclusions or findings but the simple mans way of comparing something as you'll get on reddit.
As for the 'house sound' topic pertaining to the review piece linked, I said this seems 'plausible' based on my own time spent with the Liquid Spark and going through these simple little exercises. Whether it's nonsensical or not, I don't really care as there is no value in me taking a deep dive into a budget amp to find out why or what. I'm not curious and if you say that what I'm hearing is a placebo, then so be it, I'll continue enjoying my placebo effect.
maXXXjacker t1_je6f6jr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I never thought amps made much of a difference...until I got a Liquid Spark by givemeyournews
You do you is all I have to say on that one. If graphs say one thing and my ears tell me another, it is what it is. I can only relay the findings as a matter of opinion vs fact. If it happens that my opinions align with others findings whether this be reviews, other owners, graph data or whatever gets your nipples erect then so be it but with all opinions professional or otherwise they should all still be taken with a grain of salt until you can get your hands on the gear for yourself.
Half the fun of coming onto these reddits is to share personal findings and opinions, nothing scientific about that.
maXXXjacker t1_je68ae5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I never thought amps made much of a difference...until I got a Liquid Spark by givemeyournews
In the case of the THX 788/789 and comparing against the Liquid Spark, it wasn't until comparing here that this 'warmth' was noticed, just like what OP noticed. It is what it is.
Going a step further for shits and giggles, comparing the Liquid Spark to a Magni 3 (non +) with a Modi MB 2 as the DAC using a HE-400se. Attempting to volume match as close as possible with a dB meter stuffed into the earcups then sealed to measure. On to subjective listening, the Spark has a slight bump in bass by a dB or two and what sounds like smoothness going on in the treble, subtle but still noticeable. I don't think most will give a shit about the differences when comparing side by side and if you can/can't pick up on them, it's all good because at the cost of this amp you can still have your cookie and a pat on the ass.
As for the 'house sound', I don't have any other Cavalli gear to compare besides a Liquid Platinum to get a consensus on if 'warm/smooth' are subjective/objective traits that is shared across the product line and I don't care to find out but from the articles/reviews and using my own ears to judge with the LS, seems plausible enough. YMMV.
*shrugs*
maXXXjacker t1_je2uw0p wrote
Reply to comment by givemeyournews in I never thought amps made much of a difference...until I got a Liquid Spark by givemeyournews
No worries, it is an interesting read but the cliff notes is it basically validates your discovery and that Cavalli products typically have a certain 'warmth' to them. Having the 788 flavor of THX and the Liquid Spark myself, the LS does have some warmth to it in comparison.
maXXXjacker t1_je2q5gp wrote
Reply to I never thought amps made much of a difference...until I got a Liquid Spark by givemeyournews
It's likely the so called "Cavalli house sound" that you are hearing.
Link above kind of goes into it a little.
maXXXjacker t1_je1lx0s wrote
Reply to comment by ve_ in I just had my first 'eargasm' in a very long time and it was while wearing...... Crushers? by mans_not_hot
Worth it if you want that night club experience.
maXXXjacker t1_je1keq3 wrote
Reply to comment by wheniztheend in I just had my first 'eargasm' in a very long time and it was while wearing...... Crushers? by mans_not_hot
You nailed it!
Sometimes that childish fun is what the doctor ordered!
maXXXjacker t1_je1furl wrote
Reply to comment by wheniztheend in I just had my first 'eargasm' in a very long time and it was while wearing...... Crushers? by mans_not_hot
Oh for sure, for sound quality the S12 has that in spades along with bass quality and quantity. It just can't mimic the gimmick (new meme?).
Fair assessment in that regard that the Crusher is not going to compete on this level other than delivering on its gimmick.
maXXXjacker t1_je1712g wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I just had my first 'eargasm' in a very long time and it was while wearing...... Crushers? by mans_not_hot
Not all Crusher variants sound the same, do you recall what version you had?
The whole point of this headphone is to mimic a subwoofer and it certainly accomplishes that goal.
The sound quality on my Crusher Evo is far better than the original and ANC versions. The sound quality on the Crusher isn't out to try and outdo any headphone within the same or similar price ranges. It sounds as good or better than generic Chinese wireless BT headphones that you can find on amazon that I've heard with the bass slider turned down. In short I don't feel like I just pissed into the wind by buying them or got taught a lesson for buying a 'Skullcandy'. Absolutely serviceable.
The Crusher is more of an experience, a mood and most definitely shouldn't be replacing your primary headphone. The Crusher is all about big stupid sounding bass. The haptic bass slider is a game changer for somebody like me. I've been searching far and wide for headphones that can hit HARD and DEEP without sounding like shit or making me reach deep into the pocket book to buy something like a legendary bass monster such as the Fostex TH-900 or any other headphone that is going to be completely unnecessary for something I'm not going to use all the time. I've considered buying Audeze LCD headphones to EQ them but again, price and use case isn't really justified for me.
Back to that haptics, it certainly gives me the illusion of having a sub woofer in my headphone, yes it shakes, yes it lacks nuance and could be considered one note and that is the whole point, it feels like I have a night club on my head and nothing else that I've tried can replicate that. I've tried my hand at buying headphones that people claim have a lot of bass or are basshead cans. X2HR was my first. Nope. Tried Meze 99 noir (launch version), close but the bass is too swampy, HarmonicDyne Zeus, GTFO with that, Hifiman R9, nice bass detail and punch but not hitting hard enough. I've tried to supplement bass through EQ and buying up amps like iFi Zen series for a double dose of xbass however this still doesn't get me even close to what the Crusher Evo can do for me.
Basically what I'm trying to say here is that for the price asked, there is no fu@king around with the Crusher Evo, it delivers the goods and doesn't require a ton of money or jacking around finding a headphone that can make my basshead fantasies come true. This is literally all I need for this niche and the sound I'm looking for personally.
Will it work for you, one can only hope so but I wouldn't plan on getting any kind of audiophile or spiritual experience in sound quality other than it might make you want to make a martini, smack some ass and get your groove on.
maXXXjacker t1_je0itrb wrote
Reply to I just had my first 'eargasm' in a very long time and it was while wearing...... Crushers? by mans_not_hot
I love my Crusher Evo's. They are like the weekend warrior of headphones. They are out for a good time, getting blackout drunk at nightclubs, busting the sickest moves out on the dance floor, projectile vomiting on cocktail waitresses and the next day waking up in some random persons bed, time to escape! When the weekend is over the Hifimans come back out, put their suit and tie on and do the 9x5 grind.
lol okay, maybe not that colorful but they are a lot of fun and sound good, great headphone to accompany your everyday driver when you just want to let loose and let your basshead fantasies run wild. Instant smile.
maXXXjacker t1_jdwymh3 wrote
Reply to Monoprice canceled my m1570c order. I guess you guys bought them all up when they were $200 and they still let my order go through? by didnt_ask_dont-care
Any room in the club house here? Mine got cancelled as well. Bummer.
maXXXjacker t1_jc4h0xo wrote
Reply to comment by atyne_mar in Monolith by Monoprice M1070 $200 (50% off) by insmek
Thank you very much for this very detailed response. I have a really good idea now on what to expect from them having listened to each of the headphones you mentioned.
Much appreciated!
maXXXjacker t1_jc43gn6 wrote
Reply to comment by atyne_mar in Monolith by Monoprice M1070 $200 (50% off) by insmek
How does the M1070 compare to your other Planars? Where would you say that it sits in the Hierarchy? Better than your HE5XX and Sundara? Trying to sort this one out because of lack of reviews.
maXXXjacker t1_jb3bexu wrote
Reply to comment by prains1 in how bad is the quarks dsp noise floor? by cnthvthots
I measure it manually with a dedicated decibel meter. While this is harder with IEMs I am very very familiar with what 75db (average) sounds like after doing many many measurements over time on different headphones. In reality my listening would be between 65-79dB to account for highs and lows but I like to average around 75dB.
maXXXjacker t1_jb0ngib wrote
Reply to comment by thatcarolguy in how bad is the quarks dsp noise floor? by cnthvthots
I cranked mine up to max with no music playing and had the same blackness.
As for others hearing a noise floor, I wonder if that's just their tinnitus they can hear from the Quarks most excellent seal, lol (I kid, I kid). I'm just lucky my USB ports on everything doesn't seem to transfer any kind of noise as I've had noisy USB ports in the past on my older PC.
maXXXjacker t1_jb0kaxw wrote
Reply to how bad is the quarks dsp noise floor? by cnthvthots
No noise floor that I can detect on mine at the volume levels I listen at (75dB) over multiple devices. Nothing but dead silence. Sound seems separated well enough that I can hear multiple instruments over each other and can hear sound as it travels left to center to right of my position and just behind my ear on my shoulder. For $15usd, I don't know what more one could expect here? Seems good enough.
maXXXjacker t1_jae5wkx wrote
Reply to comment by ReekyRumpFedRatsbane in Finally joined the Senny owner's club by ReekyRumpFedRatsbane
Which do you like better, 600 or R70x or is too early to tell?
maXXXjacker t1_j9v6dxf wrote
Reply to comment by OppositeStrength in Got the loot boys and let me clear things up around the Sennheiser 660S2 by AdAlternative9011
I think the reviewer(s) did lean on the 600 and 650 quite a bit to make comparisons, this was a big question on peoples mind and probably what most are familiar with.
I appreciate the improvements made on the 660S2, at the end of the day it just comes down to being willing to pay for these improvements at launch and this becomes hard when the current lineup is basically half the price for what might already be one persons perfection.
maXXXjacker t1_j9v2vzz wrote
Reply to comment by AdAlternative9011 in Got the loot boys and let me clear things up around the Sennheiser 660S2 by AdAlternative9011
Well said!
maXXXjacker t1_jegvfm9 wrote
Reply to comment by AidenBernstein in Some cheap headphones are so good it's almost ridiculous. Buy the HE400SE and SHR840A. by mistersprinkles1983
Yea fam, here you are.
https://us.creative.com/p/audio-enthusiasts/creative-sxfi-amp