namezam
namezam t1_j9agglc wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
I work for a company that does data analysis and one of our clients has us finding bias by demographics, primarily race, primarily African American. I went in to this project with an open mind, expecting to find some correlative data to suggest self-organizing populations of similar demographics trend towards their own bias, and that is the case, but that makes it very convenient for malicious humans to use seemingly innocuous algorithms to deny entire populations.
So when a large religious fried chicken joint has used metrics like location to major thoroughfares, propensity to eat out, gun ownership, church donations etc… we find that if we overlay that on a map of high-income mostly White neighborhoods… well look at that. Did they say, “we won’t build in Black and Brown neighborhoods” ? No, but they didn’t need to.
namezam t1_j9ae3kg wrote
Reply to A first-generation iPhone from 2007 sold for $63,356 at auction — more than 100 times its original price by dakiki
Tl;dr that iPhone would have had to sell for $86k to be 100x the price of what it was in 2007.
$10 today isn’t 10x $1 from 2007. Money is worth less now due to inflation. A $600 iPhone in 2007 corrected for inflation today is $865.
Another way to look at it is if you put $100 in a safe in 2007 and you pull it out now, it’s still $100 but worth a lot less than it was back then, only $69 in today’s money when buying an item that also corrected for inflation. So if a widget costs you $100 today, if it followed the same inflation, it would have cost $69 in 2007, but you still had $100 bill back then. Today that money has lost value so it takes the whole $100 to buy that widget.
Edit: well since I’m on the downvote train, I don’t guess there’s much I can do at this point but I did want to clarify that i meant this in the context of reselling an item for a profit. People will read this and say “they made 100x!” and I was showing why that’s not the case. All the time people get mad at the price of something in the past compared to now and that’s because they aren’t correcting for inflation. Sure, as the other guy pointed out price vs value, but that’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m actually talking about price, that price was in a different currency, it was in 2007USD which is not the same as today. I know we are talking about a headline and yes it’s fun to see “100x”, I just wanted to add some economics in there as well.
Edit2: removed the superfluous first line and fixed the 10x that should have been 100x
namezam t1_j43etgi wrote
Reply to comment by Square-Dragonfruit76 in Dancers flashmob funeral with Another One Bites the Dust by BQKazoo
Do a Viking send-off and give all the kids flaming arrows, the one that lights you up gets a prize.
namezam t1_it3r1e9 wrote
As opposed to blocking can they check where the request is coming from and geo distribute it? It doesn’t make sense for the rest of the world to suffer when one geographical location is causing an issue. I agree that blocking probably isn’t the solution as it’s not everyone in India causing this issue, but I do think that if they could place all this traffic on its own CDN, they could more easily tackle the issue without wreaking havoc everywhere else.
namezam t1_is8ml29 wrote
What a f’n nightmare. I saw a proposal one time where you would keep the chickens in freezing temps so they would want to pack in together by choice. As a guy who grew up on a free range farm, I cannot stand the horrors that come of some of these places. I try to limit my meat intake to places that have a trace of conscious.
namezam t1_jb6oqsm wrote
Reply to comment by MisterThere in A French photographer offers an unexpected view of the United States — through its many strip clubs by SelectiveSanity
Twilight Zone theme music