And you're on a tirade browbeating a thirty year old movie that hit a sweet spot in the market when it came out but would never get made today.

This is fairly obvious to everyone but you, and this original post has no need for existing.

>But it’s important to recognize that dissenting opinions existed.

I didn't say they didn't.

I don't excuse things. I explain them.

It was a product of its time.

The United States has an obsession with incarcerating people.

>it eloquently says something really basic and important about what you see in show business, politics, or any stage like that,

Which is?

But...for every dumb mistake an AI driver makes, human drivers probably make fifty.

The U.S. is the exception in that it does have lots of "in-fill"--loads of suburbia and strip malls in between big cities. A characteristic of a society designed around cars.

Most of the world is characterized by wide open space and long roads until your reach the next city, town, or settlement.

When you talk about two people, it's pretty hard to talk about single hands.

I'm thinking Q-tips dipped in alcohol for those tight spaces between the keys.

Shit's stupid.

Read the article? Are you crazy?.

Maybe she just wants to take a break.

You just learned that Shaq raps?

>Must this really be repeated every single time an article mentions trying to solve human destruction?

Yes.

Yeah sure

Planet doesn't need saving.

The planet's ability to sustain current human lifestyles needs saving.

Planet will be fine without us. Probably better.

If this turns out to be true, it would make for a funny story.

The article seems to imply that the alleged cheater's opponent would somehow tell he was cheating. I wonder how.

Reads the whole article.

It doesn't explain how one cheats at chess.🤔

Best I can think of is some communication unit transmitting to him moves from another expert or a super computer.

Great colors, though.