opticd

opticd t1_jdto0b8 wrote

EU countries are taking a different approach. They’re passing regulation that isn’t entirely feasible to comply with and assigning large % global revenue fines for non compliance. Their plan is to just skim revenue and benefit rather than banning.

0

opticd t1_j234agd wrote

The EU is putting up a ton but it’s primarily intended to target US tech companies and the EU has come out before saying that they’re doing it to “level the playing field” and to help “the next Google to be founded in Europe.” It’s basically thinly veiled protectionism.

The US isn’t as aggressive, though the current FTC is pretty hawkish to domestic tech companies. Congress is primarily in a jawbone posture at the moment but that’s still a sharp contrast to other countries that heavily protect (and in some cases take active measures like stealing tech) for domestic tech companies.

I do think the GOP is maybe slightly more aggro toward tech. I think it’s primarily intended because they want ownership on online platforms that’ll allow them to control speech. You see a ton of grandstanding from the left intended to target tech companies too (just look at what Warren, Klobuchar, and others have said/done in the space). It’s kind of like comparing “Wants to obliterate and control” to “Actively dislikes/despises”. Not sure either party is really favorable toward tech IMO.

2

opticd t1_j23058j wrote

Honestly, the US is really unique in that the government seems dead set on destroying its tech industry. The media has a ton of reason for targeting US tech (disrupted their ads model) and the general public has basically eaten it up wholesale. Every other country is desperate for (e.g. any EU country) or protective of (e.g. China) tech companies and the US seems dead set on shitting all over theirs (on both sides of the aisle).

4