princeps_astra
princeps_astra t1_j2xzg88 wrote
Reply to comment by Narf-a-licious in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
Oh I wouldn't go as far as saying the French knew what would happen to the plane, but that they planned for an escalation of violence seems quite evident
princeps_astra t1_j2xt9ky wrote
Reply to comment by kbad10 in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
Oh they knew the coup against Tutsi power was about to be violent. It started with the assassination of the president by having his plane crash, they weren't planning for a peaceful transition of power
princeps_astra t1_j2xsspa wrote
Reply to comment by lastethere in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
In Africa, English and French are mostly second languages used in order for different ethnic groups to communicate with each other
Hutu and Tutsi are not ethnicities only dependent on their second language, it is an ethnic and class division supported by the Belgians. Divide et impera, classic stuff
princeps_astra t1_j2wa43f wrote
Reply to comment by lastethere in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
This situation also exists in Nigeria, where again the Francosphere and Anglosphere interests clashed during the Biafra war.
And uhh, maybe I should talk to you about Canada, Belgium, Spain, China, India, Ukraine, and countless other countries that practice bilingualism or even multilingualism
princeps_astra t1_j2w3o2d wrote
Reply to comment by Squirkelspork in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
It was most definitely the government. François Mitterrand at the time was convinced (like lots of French people tbh) that the French language was going to fade everywhere to English, and that the francophone community of nations was, sort of, under siege by English.
He made it clear he supported the francophone side for this reason. Did he know what they planned to do? Hard to say, probably not, at least for the genocide, but the French government was most definitely in cahoots with them. And the French government very well knew about the planned coup. Not some private actor.
princeps_astra t1_j2w332k wrote
Reply to comment by FormalOstriches in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
Except force doesn't necessarily stop anything. It can make things much worse. There have been multiple foreign interventions made to pacify and separate the two sides of African ethnic conflicts and that rarely ends up with great results. Last one was in the CAR between the Seleka and the Anti Balaka
Edit : typo,it's the CAR not the BAR
princeps_astra t1_irfe8mf wrote
Reply to comment by Ferengi_Earwax in Did the first crusade impact significantly the war-making capacity of states like england, west and east francia? And did later crusades impose equal burdens, or was the distribution of this burden different for the 2nd and 3rd crusades? by Qazwereira
Roger de Hauteville, but not a crusader
princeps_astra t1_j3ebl5c wrote
Reply to comment by frenchchevalierblanc in Rwanda report: France ‘complicit’ in 1994 genocide | Human Rights News by Character-Rabbit-127
I personally doubt that they knew about it. However, I also doubt they would have cared about the presence of French nationals if they were aware and cool with such a project