promonk
promonk t1_iuk2cb9 wrote
Reply to comment by losbadhombres in La Bagnante Adornata, me, 3D, 2022 by losbadhombres
My vote is for "Ste. Callipygia."
promonk t1_ishu3eb wrote
Reply to comment by Kandiru in When it's said 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans, is this referring to only coding DNA or both coding and non-coding DNA combined? by PeanutSalsa
I get that. What I'm curious about is sampling. 90% of which population? Is it 90 of some college-age kids being paid a hundred bucks for a cheek swab? Or is it drawn from a broad swathe of demographics and locations?
promonk t1_ishdkr1 wrote
Reply to comment by Kandiru in When it's said 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans, is this referring to only coding DNA or both coding and non-coding DNA combined? by PeanutSalsa
When you say "more common variants," common in what way?
I'm fascinated by the idea of a "reference human."
promonk t1_ish7g8b wrote
Reply to comment by adc34 in When it's said 99.9% of human DNA is the same in all humans, is this referring to only coding DNA or both coding and non-coding DNA combined? by PeanutSalsa
Now I'm curious: whose genome is the human reference genome?
promonk t1_iy28djj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How a CoinDesk scoop led to the fall of Sam Bankman-Fried and implosion of FTX by redhatGizmo
Are you referring to the $32 million he contributed to Democratic election funds, or the $24 million he contributed to Republican election funds? 'Cause it kind of sounds like you're trying to make this about Dems vs. Repubs, and from where I'm sitting, neither looks very clean.