ricarleite2
ricarleite2 OP t1_j637jet wrote
Reply to comment by tbdw in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
Wasn't she described as being physically abused?
ricarleite2 OP t1_j62wwy7 wrote
Reply to comment by Amayeoldnow in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
Ar the epilogue Holmes is asked about Stapleton being an obvious culprit regardless of the dog due to him living under a false name nearby, and Holmes pretty much answers "Yeah well oopsie, who knows?".
ricarleite2 OP t1_j61k8aj wrote
Reply to comment by rositalagata in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
For Sir Charles, okay. Sure. Heart attack. For Henry, what would be the excuse? "Mauled by a phantom dog, oh well, case closed"?
If Henry is just shot and placed with a gun on his hand, there's no forensics back then to prove it wasn't a suicide.
ricarleite2 OP t1_j61j1lo wrote
Reply to comment by Razaelbub in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
He forces his wife, who he constantly beats, to pretend to be his sister even before he hears the Hugo Baskerville story from Dr Mortimer and thinks "A cursed ghost dog, yeah that's the way to fucking murder my uncle and cousin so I get their money". Makes no sense whatsoever.
ricarleite2 OP t1_j61djba wrote
Reply to comment by Excidiar in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
But it's risky as hell, he had witnesses of his wife, the caretaker of the dog while he was playing detective and stealing footwear wearing a fake beard in London for no fucking reason, and the odds of it failing were huge. Am I the only one who got possessed by Scott Evil's soul and thought "Just fucking shoot him!"?
Submitted by ricarleite2 t3_10m715v in books
ricarleite2 OP t1_j6cekqj wrote
Reply to comment by CoolCoalRad in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
......why???