ruferant

ruferant t1_ja4u216 wrote

Rather than focusing on individuals survival techniques, we should be focusing on how we can use this technology to make a better world for everyone.

8

ruferant t1_ja4e3k7 wrote

I do a lot of repairs on 100-year-old houses for Less well off homeowners. Frequently whatever I'm dealing with has already had one or two repairs sometime in the last century, it's head scratching stuff that will be difficult for an AI to duplicate. https://youtu.be/MVWayhNpHr0 this robot is like 5 years old. Materials aren't sourced on site, and it requires an operator, but it's doing the work of several Masons and only requires a minimal amount of expertise from the worker. https://youtu.be/e5xK2wWUIxw TBH I didn't watch this video but I've watched a bunch of individual ones, and this said it had 10. If a robot comes along halfway through and puts in piping for water and electricity can you not imagine a robot that can build an entire home. The amount of clay in any location can vary a lot, but almost every location has some clay. Maybe we go back to the ancient Mesopotamia style of living in mud brick home

2

ruferant t1_j6p896i wrote

This morning I googled 'is Athena Ishtar' and the first hit was for Ancient Origens an anti-science, for profit, borderline racist, lie factory, does that count? Are you saying Google picked that because it was the best non-biased resource? Definitely wasn't a useful reference and came in above all the anthropology and anyone associated with science or facts.

2