scmflower
scmflower t1_jatsta2 wrote
Reply to comment by razloric in Tattoos that will be gone in a year? Not so much, say regretful customers by pulltheanimal
The company 100% is at fault for false advertising. The people who bought into such an unbelievable claim from a company with little proof are idiots. Nothing I'm saying has to do with who's at fault.
scmflower t1_jate3v4 wrote
The woman this article is about is an idiot and so is anyone else who had this tattoo done and expected it to be gone in 1 year. Putting ink under your skin is going to leave a mark, even if the ink is supposed to be semi permanent, to think a tattoo like that would be gone in that time frame is ridiculous.
I swear so many people get themselves all in a tizzy because they fells for soemthing that was too good to be true. Use basic reasoning skills, ei your brain; that's what it's there for
scmflower t1_jattbp0 wrote
Reply to comment by CuriousRelish in Tattoos that will be gone in a year? Not so much, say regretful customers by pulltheanimal
The hot beverage lawsuit that you're referencing isn't quite as dumb as you think. The woman had third degree burns on 6% of her body and needed skin grafts