Your comment is a little misleading. Did you read the entire article? You've quoted a statement from a public relations spokesperson but the article speaks of having multiple sources familiar with the situation who contradict that narrative.
> Each of the four senior Genentech scientists was contacted individually by The Daily and was unaware of the others’ accounts. Their independent accounts, given over several hours of interviews, were highly consistent with each other, and also consistent with publicly available information about the research.
Read that and then read what the four scientists had to say about the situation and tell me the headline in misleading.
smootex t1_j97nzbw wrote
Reply to comment by magic1623 in Review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s research, colleagues allege by ScoMoTrudeauApricot
Your comment is a little misleading. Did you read the entire article? You've quoted a statement from a public relations spokesperson but the article speaks of having multiple sources familiar with the situation who contradict that narrative.
> Each of the four senior Genentech scientists was contacted individually by The Daily and was unaware of the others’ accounts. Their independent accounts, given over several hours of interviews, were highly consistent with each other, and also consistent with publicly available information about the research.
Read that and then read what the four scientists had to say about the situation and tell me the headline in misleading.