sonic_tower
sonic_tower t1_jb7t8bk wrote
sonic_tower t1_j1hbyu2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in At least 9 dead as massive winter storm leaves more than a million without power and bitter cold across much of US | CNN by bobybobobo
American here.
You would think all the "preppers" would be ready for a snow storm. But they were too busy buying guns and researching bunker mansions online.
You can't shoot your way out of cold weather. A real prepper would have traded their guns for blankets, firewood, and potatoes.
sonic_tower t1_iuwb5ao wrote
Reply to comment by tirednervousbroke in [OC] Salesforce is one of the largest SaaS company in the world - how does it make money and how much? by giteam
Chunky Rancid Milk?
sonic_tower t1_iuvl8kf wrote
Reply to [OC] Salesforce is one of the largest SaaS company in the world - how does it make money and how much? by giteam
Not dinging the chart (it's nice!), but
-
I still don't know what Salesforce does.
-
That is a sad profit margin, compared to the tech and oil companies that have been on this sub lately.
sonic_tower t1_isw0wvc wrote
Reply to Sunrise on the Lost Coast Trail - Humboldt County, California [OC] [3008x2000] by mhd1photo
One of my favorite hikes. Partly because barely anyone does it.
sonic_tower t1_iscd3vp wrote
Reply to Animal populations have shrunk an average of 69% over the last half-century and are continuing to decline, a report says, and we've got limited time to try to fix it. by mossadnik
Nice.
But actually horrible. 50 years on an ecological time scale is nothing. It isn't that a great collapse is coming soon. It is happening now. It's like we are on an airplane about to crash into the ground, except we have already crashed and in a snapshot, two thirds of the plane have made contact.
sonic_tower t1_jbui4n3 wrote
Reply to Natural Behaviour Is Not Enough: Farm Animal Welfare Needs Modern Answers to Tinbergen’s Four Questions by Meatrition
Never seen Tinbergen's questions applied to ethics before. Seems like a bit of a mismatch.
First off, we are presupposing that animal welfare is morally good and that what humans value should align with what nonhuman animals value. You could make a case that this is what ought to be right, but that's not the thesis of this paper.
Second, and closer to the paper's argument, it's weird to think an animal's values will align with Tinbergens questions (answers). For example, every animal wants to consume food, but not every animal values becoming fat. Fish don't value having gills. Answering these questions in a satisfying way would also introduce circular logic, or absurd answers, like fish value gills but arent aware of their values, and humans value fat but deny it if you ask them.
Big fan of the four questions, and of animal welfare, but this paper doesn't use the former to help the latter.