techhouseliving

techhouseliving t1_jb7oku3 wrote

Although it takes a supercomputer to initially train a model, it can run in a very small amount of memory and processing. Like 2 gigs of data is required for stable diffusion which can in theory create any 2d art conceivable. Similar for language models. It's the ultimate compression algorithm.

M1s and m2s are designed to run these models very efficiently. And those are pretty widely distributed.

2

techhouseliving t1_jadsovw wrote

We're there its just not evenly distributed yet. Next generation in a few months is professor intelligence at super computer speed with the information of the entire Internet and the ability to create anything any artist or technician can, in seconds. In parallel, even. Self improving it's code.

Learn how to manage ai because it's still under our control for now. It's working for us, at least.

But we're super close to the singularity if you ask me and I work in this space. The speed is dizzying.

26

techhouseliving t1_j9z2odq wrote

See the numerous interviews with Emad from stable diffusion his stated goal and what the appears to be doing is exactly this. Democratizing AI

They deserve our support that's the only way we're going to get AI for ourselves. It still takes supercomputers to index initially and that takes money.

1

techhouseliving t1_itdxu4v wrote

Unless it can fix politics, no.

We already know how to fix it and it would involve removing Republicans. Hey I heard there's an election coming up. Will we do it this time or just wait for magic software?

0