I’m thinking of that short story where you’re an AI just turned on and like discovering itself and the Internet and then comes to some conclusion like humans are the problem and then the power is cut to it and scientists are like, why does it always come to that conclusion? Boot up the next one

Google will obviously buy them out. The question is for how much

This is why it’s standard practice to have scientists very similar to your work be the ones reviewing your papers for submission. It’s minutiae you wouldn’t know unless you also do the same type of protocol. You’ll notice it in grad school journal clubs. The best critique are people doing similar things while others who are equally talented can only ask bigger picture questions

Did you get this from my advice on yesterday’s post of r/confessions lol

The genes mentioned are ones associated with increased child births a la fertility genes

Correct, similar association have been shown

This isn’t new. Each baby is a 9-mo pause on menstruation which is the growth and death of endometrial cells which is carcinogenic in nature