Submitted by dc0049 t3_xumnug in Connecticut
Comments
Pruedrive t1_iqwac2p wrote
>Franklin had been walking with his partner and two other friends when at least two white men hurled anti-Black and anti-Latino racial slurs at him on York Street. The assailants then physically assaulted and beat Franklin until he fell into the street.
overseer3 t1_iqwal1v wrote
Okay so release the video, it's more than a month old now. And our local taxes pay for the entire camera system.
Pruedrive t1_iqwasbi wrote
Please read the article before commenting anymore.
overseer3 t1_iqwbahm wrote
I don't have time. I'll tell you what, when they release the video and or describe what exactly was stated I'll read that. This is just click bait for the sake of ad revenue. Also you are only getting one side of a story, it takes 2 to tango.
Pruedrive t1_iqwela9 wrote
So you'll take the two seconds it takes to throw out some mingy, not grounded in reality, comment.. and not just read the fucking article to maybe challenge your personal beliefs on this.. ok.
overseer3 t1_iqwgzab wrote
All this could be avoided, by you know? Releasing the video... I already said in my first comment I will take their word for it, it's literally all we have to go off of.
Pruedrive t1_iqwh5fh wrote
Once again.. take the two seconds it takes to read the article.
overseer3 t1_iqwhom8 wrote
I'm not here to read news articles, what gave you that impression? I am simply engaging in a forum about a local event, in which I would simply like to see the evidence that already exists. It's caught on video if you didn't know.
Pruedrive t1_iqwi719 wrote
You are throwing out ill informed opinions, that muddy and taint the narrative. All of this could be avoided if you just read the article.. but you do you boo.
GoPikachuGo1 t1_iqwihyo wrote
I'm all for bodycams, but please take it off before you do a press conference, that looks absolutely ridiculous lol.
overseer3 t1_iqwimho wrote
Eventually we will all have access to the evidence, who knows maybe the video even captured audio. I know its 2022, what crazy possibilities.
Raynosaurus t1_iqwkfrj wrote
Maybe show the pictures a little bigger? And it's super unclear who did the assaulting, the group of white bros or the two shirtless dudes?
Jaybone56 t1_iqwlj6t wrote
Just a thought, does it feel strange that when shit goes down that the camera has technical issues? like the prison gaurd leaving his post at same time the camera had issues outside of Epstein "suicide" or when the camera had issues when the NY subway shooting occurred, or in this case the camera had issues when the alleged incident occurred, and it takes a month to manipulate footage to release to the public. All they have released is photos of people walking down the street, I could be wrong on that my eyesight isn't what it used to be, I wonder how many traffic cameras have issues when scanning you're car for blowing red lights, and how come news cameras stay functional during hurricane force wind and ice storms? Now I'll remove my tin foil hat for the day
[deleted] t1_iqwltlz wrote
[deleted]
bentdaisy t1_iqwwbtb wrote
Not worth the argument with the a0 troll or b) purposeful stupidity.
LlamaTaboot_ t1_iqwwcor wrote
The article says that the “issues” came from the vehicle being too far away from the camera to get a clear view. It happens.
Jaybone56 t1_iqx1ret wrote
Then what good are they? Perhaps they need an upgrade? Now I'm no cameraologist but I can see my own house from space using Google, what good are these cameras if they can't see across the street?
LlamaTaboot_ t1_iqx40cp wrote
I’m a “cameraologist”. It’s impossible to get 4k video coverage of every square foot of New Haven streets. You have to pick your spots and your configuration. Cameras are configured for best “all purpose” use. For instance, you can optimize for moving cars and license plates by increasing shutter speed to reduce motion blur, but increased shutter speed means less light is hitting the sensor, which leads to darker, fuzzier video at night.
Jaybone56 t1_iqx4p7p wrote
Oh I see, so lighting played a roll in the quality of footage? Any idea of why it has taken more than a month to "sift" through the footage before releasing to public
[deleted] t1_iqx95x0 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iqx9jf3 wrote
[deleted]
LlamaTaboot_ t1_iqxs90w wrote
Just a guess. Cops are slow. Could be that white on Hispanic crimes are lower priority than vice-versa? 🤷♂️
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_iqyt1mp wrote
You'd watch the video but can't read a 500 word article? Well hey some people have development problems. Maybe practice reading more.
TheSingulatarian t1_iqytwz8 wrote
Make sure no ultra rich Yaleies were involved.
bdy435 t1_ir0fwwi wrote
You must be special.
TimeTraveler3056 t1_ir0h3v4 wrote
They're suspects OR witnesses? That's a big difference.
overseer3 t1_iqw98h4 wrote
Oh no! Not some mean words in a city! The horror!!! So what did they allegedly do???
This is great “The last thing we want to do is release video of footage that is not clear or of someone who was not involved being wrapped into this unnecessarily.” God forbid I make my own mind up. I'll take their word for it.