Submitted by AdHistorical7107 t3_115czd0 in Connecticut
AdHistorical7107 OP t1_j90zolk wrote
Reply to comment by Dale_Wardark in here's a question regarding gun control by AdHistorical7107
According to the police department, they aren't allowed to disclose that information. But the officer could be wrong.
404freedom14liberty t1_j912fek wrote
The fact whether she has a permit doesn’t answer whether she has firearms or not. I’m not sure how this information would help you. If she’s a danger to you or herself the police/her family/probate court need to be involved.
AdHistorical7107 OP t1_j912wjb wrote
OK, but pardon my ignorance here. Why would someone get a permit without an intention of buying a firearm? If you get a permit, and you are later diagnosed with a mental illness, are you required by law to notify someone (law enforcement, atf, fbi)?
I dont have one, so genuinely curious with all of this.
404freedom14liberty t1_j918elq wrote
I guess I was thinking she may have already had them.
This is why I suggested it would be necessary to get the police, etc involved. She can be conserved which would get the firearms out of her possession if she’s a danger. Permits are revoked in that situation.
Up until relatively recently one didn’t need a permit to purchase guns. There were some controls but you could have purchased a firearm at a tag sale.
AdHistorical7107 OP t1_j91ayl7 wrote
Police have been involved twice already. So I know they are aware of her, and probably if she is in possession of a permit/weapon.
But your input is appreciated.
DeskFan203 t1_j91tto1 wrote
Ohhhh then why are you concerned if LEO already involved? That's good, someone is monitoring her.
AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j92jpd0 wrote
Have you ever worked with LEO?
DeskFan203 t1_j92k8nf wrote
OK OK good point...
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments