yeah_i_am_new_here OP t1_jeatis3 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 5:46 PM

Reply to comment by samwell_4548 in Thought experiment: we're only [x] # of hardware improvements away from "AGI" by yeah_i_am_new_here

Interesting. So then we can suppose that if you had enough of these humanoids walking around, they could gather data and feed it back into a "hive mind" (as much as I hate that saying), and retrain the software running the humanoid with that new data, basically giving it a chance to "learn".

I see many hardware limitations with this possibility, but it's an interesting thought.

Perhaps another interesting thought based off of yours is, how much brand new data in our surroundings (that's not already trained on the internet) do you suppose exists in the world?

Mercurionio t1_jebcy9s wrote on March 30, 2023 at 7:50 PM

The question is how machine will iterate the stuff. Like, it gets new info about surroundings and add to the code immediately and completely changing it's behavior on the outcome. Or just collects the data and then reprocess words into bigger salad.

Currently, gpt4 can return to original incorrect answers because it keeps iterating the salad until the user is satisfied.