Mercurionio
Mercurionio t1_jebaki2 wrote
Reply to Tractor Beams - What is This Magic? by tculler
Dark matter, changing the direction of gravitational waves.
Mercurionio t1_jeawkrp wrote
Reply to When do you think it will be possible to create a video from a memory with just a helmet over the head? by Possible_Being_3189
At this point surveillance will be so large, that having thoughts will be a crime.
So I'd rather wouldn't think about it. And hope to die before it will become a thing.
PS: or we will psionically ascend. That's I can greet easily
Mercurionio t1_je8mp3i wrote
Reply to We’re halfway to a tipping point that would trigger 6 feet of sea level rise from melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet by Bored-sideline
It's irrelevant anyway. We have much bigger problem thx to Altman and other freaks.
Mercurionio t1_je4clfy wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
I'm the embodiment of what will happen.
Some will have access to it and will be able to adapt somehow. Others won't and, basically, will die. Like me.
Finally, there will be those, who control the access. Guess what they will have.
Mercurionio t1_je4adx6 wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
In combination with paywall it won't work anyway.
And you answered already for yourself.
Bard is a mystery for now, but likely, it will be the same as GPT4 and ClosedAI policy.
Mercurionio t1_je49iyt wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
The access is locked behind countries, not paywall. I don't mind paying 20$ to be able to study it. But I have to move to a specific country for that.
How it's gonna be solved? (Spoiler, it won't be solved)
Mercurionio t1_je48pn9 wrote
Reply to comment by No-Wallaby-5568 in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
It will be improved towards what is needed.
The question is not about "I lost my job, where to go". The question is to plan ahead for a year at least.
Frankly, AI already did kill our future. We can't plan for it, we can't prepare for it, we don't what will happen tomorrow. It's like knowing the date of your death, but from the opposite angle. The same frustration and fear.
Mercurionio t1_je48h14 wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
And if you don't have access to it, what those should do?
Mercurionio t1_je46ts5 wrote
Reply to comment by Cerulean_IsFancyBlue in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
AGI is a hardware, that is not chained with awaiting for the prompt.
Imagine a loop "do... While...". Where "While" is limited by energy consumption.
Mercurionio t1_je46ed5 wrote
No.
They will keep it to themselves as long as possible.
Mercurionio t1_jdwr7vn wrote
Reply to comment by MrZwink in Would building a Dyson sphere be worth it: We ran the numbers. by filosoful
Stellaris gonna wild these days
Mercurionio t1_jduayoy wrote
Reply to comment by TarTarkus1 in Have deepfakes become so realistic that they can fool people into thinking they are genuine? by [deleted]
There were images of Trump being violently arrested. Some of them were pretty realistic if you look in bad quality.
Mercurionio t1_jduavay wrote
Reply to comment by v13ragnarok7 in Have deepfakes become so realistic that they can fool people into thinking they are genuine? by [deleted]
Look at his right hand
Mercurionio t1_jdrwden wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
I would agree with you unless I haven't seen the tyrants, showing their power over peasants.
Smart and brave are dangerous for you, they are not your friends.
Mercurionio t1_jdruep2 wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
If you are filthy rich, you would rather prefer to maintain your position and not to worry about others.
That's because you became filthy rich.
Mercurionio t1_jdren3q wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
From the looks of it, masses don't know about upcoming doom. So, when it actually come, they will blame anyone, who will be Targeted by populists.
Mercurionio t1_jdrecm5 wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
While 1st option is better, it, most likely, won't happen. Because rich people and power hungry maniacs/dictators won't give up wellbeing for peasants. Poor people are easier to manipulate, so most likely it will end up at "just survive" level. And AI will be used to brainwash them.
Classic dystopia.
Mercurionio t1_jdqwpnl wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
Points to what? Why UBI is bad? Why Utopia is NOT possible?
The answer is pretty simple. Because we are humans.
If you were born in free countries like Norway, you see the world as a beautiful place. But if you were born in post soviet shit holes or China/Iran like, you should understand, what a crap our world is. Not only UBI is a Feudalism thing (because, those, who in charge, will decide, how much you will get), Utopia isn't possible because resources are limited. Unless we start synthesising EVERY mineral or organic material, nobody will be in equal positions. There will always exist something, that millions will want to have, but not able to get because it will be hoarded by those, who have power.
Either you see Jesus coming back and uniting everyone under one banner, deliting power hunger and giving us unlimited access to resources, OR you see fascists and dictators rising in a quest to hoard everything to themselves.
Mercurionio t1_jdqvy34 wrote
Reply to comment by acutelychronicpanic in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
While I can agree with you on the first part, second part is the problem. The goverment is a reactive thing. They will take actions only AFTER people will lose their job in masses. Not before that.
Mercurionio t1_jdqm0p7 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
Good luck with experiencing full automatation
Mercurionio t1_jdqke6k wrote
Reply to comment by Good-Advantage-9687 in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
Well, Yes. Government need to force corporations to create jobs for humans, restrict full automation and so on. That what unions exist for.
Alternative is a war for survival.
Mercurionio t1_jdqixtq wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_A_PM_PLEASE_PM in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
And ClosedAI just gave them the ultimate tool for that.
Mercurionio t1_jdqicy4 wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_A_PM_PLEASE_PM in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
And who is behind those decisions?
And yes, I'm talking about AI destroying society due to automation.
Mercurionio t1_jdqgwzz wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_A_PM_PLEASE_PM in Taxes in A.I dominated labour market by Newhereeeeee
No, I'm saying that humans are needed to fulfill human's desires. Like, you need humans to give orders, because if an AI will give orders it will quickly go into the situation of slavery under AI.
And if you want blood, then this is the way.
Mercurionio t1_jebcy9s wrote
Reply to comment by yeah_i_am_new_here in Thought experiment: we're only [x] # of hardware improvements away from "AGI" by yeah_i_am_new_here
The question is how machine will iterate the stuff. Like, it gets new info about surroundings and add to the code immediately and completely changing it's behavior on the outcome. Or just collects the data and then reprocess words into bigger salad.
Currently, gpt4 can return to original incorrect answers because it keeps iterating the salad until the user is satisfied.